1998PubMedRequires access

Evaluation of reactogenicity and immunogenicity of two influenza vaccines (vaxigrip and fluarix) in the season 1996-1997.

Jiřı́ Beran, Roman Prymula, Roman Chlíbek, R Rychlý, Miroslav Špliňo, Petr Douda, Peter Gal

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Influenza is a very serious disease, which causes thousands of deaths all over the world every year. As there is so far no sufficiently effective causal therapy of influenza the main function of vaccination lies in prevention. Influenza is a major problem especially in collective facilities. Therefore, great emphasis is laid in the Czech Republic Army on the vaccination of military groups and on the evaluation of reactogenicity and immunogenicity of the vaccines used. The specific aim of the clinical trial was to evaluate the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of two inactivated split influenza vaccines Fluarix and Vaxigrip in healthy adult volunteers aged 18-60 years with stress on military groups. The study was designed as an open clinical trial with 2 groups each of 100 volunteers in one centre. Randomisation was not conducted so that each group received only the vaccine specified beforehand. Both the inactivated split vaccines evaluated, Vaxigrip and Fluarix are highly immunogenic both against declared and other antigenic variants of influenza. The study has demonstrated a favourable trend in the preparation of influenza vaccines towards a marked reduction of general solicited symptoms as compared with previous years. Despite minute differences in immunogenicity and reactogenicity, the vaccines are generally speaking comparable, and in healthy individuals aged 18-60 years they induce a sufficient protection against the onset and development of influenza. The results of our open clinical trial (without randomisation) have again proved that both manufacturers produce vaccines of a high European standard.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Influenza is a very serious disease, which causes thousands of deaths all over the world every year. As there is so far no sufficiently effective causal therapy of influenza the main function of vaccination lies in prevention. Influenza is a major problem especially in collective facilities. Therefore, great emphasis is laid in the Czech Republic Army on the vaccination of military groups and on the evaluation of reactogenicity and immunogenicity of the vaccines used. The specific aim of the clinical trial was to evaluate the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of two inactivated split influenza vaccines Fluarix and Vaxigrip in healthy adult volunteers aged 18-60 years with stress on military groups. The study was designed as an open clinical trial with 2 groups each of 100 volunteers in one centre. Randomisation was not conducted so that each group received only the vaccine specified beforehand. Both the inactivated split vaccines evaluated, Vaxigrip and Fluarix are highly immunogenic both against declared and other antigenic variants of influenza. The study has demonstrated a favourable trend in the preparation of influenza vaccines towards a marked reduction of general solicited symptoms as compared with previous years. Despite minute differences in immunogenicity and reactogenicity, the vaccines are generally speaking comparable, and in healthy individuals aged 18-60 years they induce a sufficient protection against the onset and development of influenza. The results of our open clinical trial (without randomisation) have again proved that both manufacturers produce vaccines of a high European standard.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Influenza is a very serious disease, which causes thousands of deaths all over the world every year. As there is so far no sufficiently effective causal therapy of influenza the main function of vaccination lies in prevention. Influenza is a major problem especially in collective facilities. Therefore, great emphasis is laid in the Czech Republic Army on the vaccination of military groups and on the evaluation of reactogenicity and immunogenicity of the vaccines used. The specific aim of the clinical trial was to evaluate the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of two inactivated split influenza vaccines Fluarix and Vaxigrip in healthy adult volunteers aged 18-60 years with stress on military groups. The study was designed as an open clinical trial with 2 groups each of 100 volunteers in one centre. Randomisation was not conducted so that each group received only the vaccine specified beforehand. Both the inactivated split vaccines evaluated, Vaxigrip and Fluarix are highly immunogenic both against declared and other antigenic variants of influenza. The study has demonstrated a favourable trend in the preparation of influenza vaccines towards a marked reduction of general solicited symptoms as compared with previous years. Despite minute differences in immunogenicity and reactogenicity, the vaccines are generally speaking comparable, and in healthy individuals aged 18-60 years they induce a sufficient protection against the onset and development of influenza. The results of our open clinical trial (without randomisation) have again proved that both manufacturers produce vaccines of a high European standard.

Key concepts: Reactogenicity, Immunogenicity, Medicine, Vaccination, Live attenuated influenza vaccine, Clinical trial, Influenza vaccine, Trivalent influenza vaccine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of reactogenicity and immunogenicity of two influenza vaccines (vaxigrip and fluarix) in the season 1996-1997. — Research Paper | ScholarLens