1993PubMedRequires access

[Chlamydia trachomatis conjunctivitis in adults. Study of diagnostic techniques].

J.P. Adenis, P Saint-Blancat, S. Ranger, P. Martin, Frédéric Duprat, S Barbarie

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The place of Chlamydia trachomatis in acute or chronic conjunctivitis is certainly underestimated due to the difficulties involved in the diagnosis. Three diagnostic techniques for Chlamydia trachomatis conjunctivitis were compared: conjunctival sac swab for ELISA technique, scraping of the tarsal conjunctiva for direct immunofluorescence and for culture. Two groups of patients were studied: 73 patients with acute or chronic conjunctivitis and 44 asymptomatic patients. 19.2% of the patients in the first group had a positive result with the two techniques and 6.8% of the patients in the second group also had positive results with the same criteria. Our results show that indirect immunofluorescence is the technique most frequently positive, followed by ELISA, while culture remains the most specific but the least sensitive technique. The existence of healthy carriers Chlamydia trachomatis is demonstrated.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The place of Chlamydia trachomatis in acute or chronic conjunctivitis is certainly underestimated due to the difficulties involved in the diagnosis. Three diagnostic techniques for Chlamydia trachomatis conjunctivitis were compared: conjunctival sac swab for ELISA technique, scraping of the tarsal conjunctiva for direct immunofluorescence and for culture. Two groups of patients were studied: 73 patients with acute or chronic conjunctivitis and 44 asymptomatic patients. 19.2% of the patients in the first group had a positive result with the two techniques and 6.8% of the patients in the second group also had positive results with the same criteria. Our results show that indirect immunofluorescence is the technique most frequently positive, followed by ELISA, while culture remains the most specific but the least sensitive technique. The existence of healthy carriers Chlamydia trachomatis is demonstrated.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The place of Chlamydia trachomatis in acute or chronic conjunctivitis is certainly underestimated due to the difficulties involved in the diagnosis. Three diagnostic techniques for Chlamydia trachomatis conjunctivitis were compared: conjunctival sac swab for ELISA technique, scraping of the tarsal conjunctiva for direct immunofluorescence and for culture. Two groups of patients were studied: 73 patients with acute or chronic conjunctivitis and 44 asymptomatic patients. 19.2% of the patients in the first group had a positive result with the two techniques and 6.8% of the patients in the second group also had positive results with the same criteria. Our results show that indirect immunofluorescence is the technique most frequently positive, followed by ELISA, while culture remains the most specific but the least sensitive technique. The existence of healthy carriers Chlamydia trachomatis is demonstrated.

Key concepts: Chlamydia trachomatis, Asymptomatic, Conjunctiva, Medicine, Direct fluorescent antibody, Chlamydia, Chlamydiales, Trachoma

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Chlamydia trachomatis conjunctivitis in adults. Study of diagnostic techniques]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens