1988PubMedRequires access

Disturbed eruption of the permanent lower second molar: treatment and results.

B Wellfelt, M Varpio

Open publisher page 57 citations

Abstract

To facilitate treatment of impacted lower second molars, different modes of treatment were studied retrospectively and the results related to the inclination and the degree of impaction of the tooth. Seventy-seven referred patients were treated with one of three basic methods: denudation of the second molar, orthodontics, or extraction of a molar. The methods were often combined, with a total of seventeen treatment combinations applied. Of the 95 impacted teeth, 68 percent were treated successfully, 21 percent acceptably, and 11 percent unsuccessfully. Irrespective of the degree of retention, the treatment of mesioangular impaction was most successful. The partially retained molars in the distoangular and vertical positions were particularly resistant to treatment. No method was superior to the others. Denudation could suffice, but usually a molar had to be extracted because of crowding. Orthodontic treatment was sometimes necessary to obtain correct axial inclination.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To facilitate treatment of impacted lower second molars, different modes of treatment were studied retrospectively and the results related to the inclination and the degree of impaction of the tooth. Seventy-seven referred patients were treated with one of three basic methods: denudation of the second molar, orthodontics, or extraction of a molar. The methods were often combined, with a total of seventeen treatment combinations applied. Of the 95 impacted teeth, 68 percent were treated successfully, 21 percent acceptably, and 11 percent unsuccessfully. Irrespective of the degree of retention, the treatment of mesioangular impaction was most successful. The partially retained molars in the distoangular and vertical positions were particularly resistant to treatment. No method was superior to the others. Denudation could suffice, but usually a molar had to be extracted because of crowding. Orthodontic treatment was sometimes necessary to obtain correct axial inclination.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 57 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To facilitate treatment of impacted lower second molars, different modes of treatment were studied retrospectively and the results related to the inclination and the degree of impaction of the tooth. Seventy-seven referred patients were treated with one of three basic methods: denudation of the second molar, orthodontics, or extraction of a molar. The methods were often combined, with a total of seventeen treatment combinations applied. Of the 95 impacted teeth, 68 percent were treated successfully, 21 percent acceptably, and 11 percent unsuccessfully. Irrespective of the degree of retention, the treatment of mesioangular impaction was most successful. The partially retained molars in the distoangular and vertical positions were particularly resistant to treatment. No method was superior to the others. Denudation could suffice, but usually a molar had to be extracted because of crowding. Orthodontic treatment was sometimes necessary to obtain correct axial inclination.

Key concepts: Impaction, Molar, Dentistry, Orthodontics, Medicine, Impacted tooth, Mandibular second molar, Mandibular first molar

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Disturbed eruption of the permanent lower second molar: treatment and results. — Research Paper | ScholarLens