A simple office spirometer for the pediatrician.
Roy F. Goddard, Klein Wm, Smith Rm
Abstract
Roy F. Goddard, Klein Wm, Smith Rm
Abstract
A comparative study of a new, simple, pneumatic, direct-recording office spirometer versus a long-accepted, water-sealed, water-filled spirometer was performed on 103 patients ranging from four to 20 years of age. Good correlation between the two spirometers was seen through a wide range of values for forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced expiratory flow during 25% to 75% of forced vital capacity and FEV1/FVC.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A comparative study of a new, simple, pneumatic, direct-recording office spirometer versus a long-accepted, water-sealed, water-filled spirometer was performed on 103 patients ranging from four to 20 years of age. Good correlation between the two spirometers was seen through a wide range of values for forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced expiratory flow during 25% to 75% of forced vital capacity and FEV1/FVC.
Key concepts: Spirometer, Vital capacity, Medicine, Spirometry, Forced-air, Asthma, Lung function, Internal medicine