Detection of Helicobacter pylori using nested polymerase chain reaction and rapid urease test in gastric biopsy samples.
Hamiyet Dönmez‐Altuntaş, Kadri Güven
Abstract
Hamiyet Dönmez‐Altuntaş, Kadri Güven
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to compare nested polymerase chain reaction and rapid urease test findings in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: Two gastric biopsy specimens were obtained from each of 64 patients and polymerase chain reaction and rapid urease test were performed. DNA extraction was followed by amplification with two primer pairs from the urease A gene of Helicobacter pylori genome. RESULTS: Fourty two patients (65.6%) had a positive rapid urease test result while 22 (34.4%) had a negative result for Helicobacter pylori. Sixty of 64 patients (93.8 %) had a positive result with the nested polymerase chain reaction method. Four patients with negative nested polymerase chain reaction results also had negative rapid urease test results. All of the eighteen patients with rapid urease test-negative results were positive with nested polymerase chain reaction. The number of nested polymerase chain reaction-positive patients (93.8%) was significantly higher than rapid urease test-positive (65.6%) and first round polymerase chain reaction-positive (53.1%) patients (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the nested polymerase chain reaction is more specific and sensitive than the rapid urease test for detecting Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy samples.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to compare nested polymerase chain reaction and rapid urease test findings in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: Two gastric biopsy specimens were obtained from each of 64 patients and polymerase chain reaction and rapid urease test were performed. DNA extraction was followed by amplification with two primer pairs from the urease A gene of Helicobacter pylori genome. RESULTS: Fourty two patients (65.6%) had a positive rapid urease test result while 22 (34.4%) had a negative result for Helicobacter pylori. Sixty of 64 patients (93.8 %) had a positive result with the nested polymerase chain reaction method. Four patients with negative nested polymerase chain reaction results also had negative rapid urease test results. All of the eighteen patients with rapid urease test-negative results were positive with nested polymerase chain reaction. The number of nested polymerase chain reaction-positive patients (93.8%) was significantly higher than rapid urease test-positive (65.6%) and first round polymerase chain reaction-positive (53.1%) patients (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the nested polymerase chain reaction is more specific and sensitive than the rapid urease test for detecting Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy samples.
Key concepts: Nested polymerase chain reaction, Polymerase chain reaction, Helicobacter pylori, Rapid urease test, Urease, Primer (cosmetics), Medicine, Polymerase