2001PubMedRequires access

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for diagnosing hepatolithiasis.

Masanori Sugiyama, Yutaka Atomi, Taro Takahara, J Hachiya

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Direct cholangiography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography sometimes fails to adequately opacify the entire biliary tract, because of severe biliary obstruction caused by ductal stricture or lodged stones. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for hepatolithiasis. METHODOLOGY: Five patients with hepatolithiasis underwent ultrasonography, computed tomography, direct cholangiography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, using a half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence. Surgical exploration or pathologic examination revealed stricture and dilatation of the intrahepatic ducts in all patients. Diagnostic accuracies for stones and ductal abnormalities were compared among the imaging studies. RESULTS: No complications occurred during magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography studies. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography fully depicted the biliary tract. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately detected and localized intrahepatic stones, as well as bile duct stricture and dilatation, in all patients. Intrahepatic stones were detected by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in one of four patients and by percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography in all three who underwent this procedure. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography demonstrated ductal stricture in all patients but failed to completely demonstrate the biliary tree in three of four patients, and one of three, respectively. On ultrasonography and computed tomography, precise localization of stones was difficult. Ultrasonography and computed tomography failed to demonstrate ductal stricture in one and two of the five patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography diagnoses intrahepatic stones and bile duct abnormalities less invasively and more accurately than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Direct cholangiography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography sometimes fails to adequately opacify the entire biliary tract, because of severe biliary obstruction caused by ductal stricture or lodged stones. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for hepatolithiasis. METHODOLOGY: Five patients with hepatolithiasis underwent ultrasonography, computed tomography, direct cholangiography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, using a half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence. Surgical exploration or pathologic examination revealed stricture and dilatation of the intrahepatic ducts in all patients. Diagnostic accuracies for stones and ductal abnormalities were compared among the imaging studies. RESULTS: No complications occurred during magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography studies. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography fully depicted the biliary tract. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately detected and localized intrahepatic stones, as well as bile duct stricture and dilatation, in all patients. Intrahepatic stones were detected by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in one of four patients and by percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography in all three who underwent this procedure. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography demonstrated ductal stricture in all patients but failed to completely demonstrate the biliary tree in three of four patients, and one of three, respectively. On ultrasonography and computed tomography, precise localization of stones was difficult. Ultrasonography and computed tomography failed to demonstrate ductal stricture in one and two of the five patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography diagnoses intrahepatic stones and bile duct abnormalities less invasively and more accurately than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Direct cholangiography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography sometimes fails to adequately opacify the entire biliary tract, because of severe biliary obstruction caused by ductal stricture or lodged stones. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for hepatolithiasis. METHODOLOGY: Five patients with hepatolithiasis underwent ultrasonography, computed tomography, direct cholangiography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, using a half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence. Surgical exploration or pathologic examination revealed stricture and dilatation of the intrahepatic ducts in all patients. Diagnostic accuracies for stones and ductal abnormalities were compared among the imaging studies. RESULTS: No complications occurred during magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography studies. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography fully depicted the biliary tract. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately detected and localized intrahepatic stones, as well as bile duct stricture and dilatation, in all patients. Intrahepatic stones were detected by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in one of four patients and by percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography in all three who underwent this procedure. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography demonstrated ductal stricture in all patients but failed to completely demonstrate the biliary tree in three of four patients, and one of three, respectively. On ultrasonography and computed tomography, precise localization of stones was difficult. Ultrasonography and computed tomography failed to demonstrate ductal stricture in one and two of the five patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography diagnoses intrahepatic stones and bile duct abnormalities less invasively and more accurately than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.

Key concepts: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, Medicine, Hepatolithiasis, Radiology, Cholangiography, Magnetic resonance imaging

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for diagnosing hepatolithiasis. — Research Paper | ScholarLens