1982PubMedRequires access

Pirenzepine and cimetidine in the treatment of peptic ulcer.

Hans Sperup Brünner

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

In a randomized, controlled multicenter-study 126 patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer were treated with 100 mg Pirenzepine daily and 128 patients with 1000 mg Cimetidine daily. Endoscopic evaluation was done by an independent endoscopist after four weeks. At this time 64.3% of the Pirenzepine-treated patients and 73.4% of the patients on Cimetidine had the ulcer healed. The chi-square value of 2.48 indicates that the difference was not statistically significant, that Pirenzepine is equally or at least not essentially less effective than Cimetidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer. Pain relief was good in both groups with a trend in favour of Cimetidine. Side effects were seldom, mild and reversible.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In a randomized, controlled multicenter-study 126 patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer were treated with 100 mg Pirenzepine daily and 128 patients with 1000 mg Cimetidine daily. Endoscopic evaluation was done by an independent endoscopist after four weeks. At this time 64.3% of the Pirenzepine-treated patients and 73.4% of the patients on Cimetidine had the ulcer healed. The chi-square value of 2.48 indicates that the difference was not statistically significant, that Pirenzepine is equally or at least not essentially less effective than Cimetidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer. Pain relief was good in both groups with a trend in favour of Cimetidine. Side effects were seldom, mild and reversible.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In a randomized, controlled multicenter-study 126 patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer were treated with 100 mg Pirenzepine daily and 128 patients with 1000 mg Cimetidine daily. Endoscopic evaluation was done by an independent endoscopist after four weeks. At this time 64.3% of the Pirenzepine-treated patients and 73.4% of the patients on Cimetidine had the ulcer healed. The chi-square value of 2.48 indicates that the difference was not statistically significant, that Pirenzepine is equally or at least not essentially less effective than Cimetidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer. Pain relief was good in both groups with a trend in favour of Cimetidine. Side effects were seldom, mild and reversible.

Key concepts: Cimetidine, Pirenzepine, Medicine, Duodenal ulcer, Gastroenterology, Peptic ulcer, Internal medicine, Duodenum

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pirenzepine and cimetidine in the treatment of peptic ulcer. — Research Paper | ScholarLens