1991PubMedRequires access

[Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of aortic valve prosthesis. Analysis of the reproducibility of pressure gradients and surface measurements].

Jean François Berdah, N Baubion, M Massougbodji, P Montgermont, L Atal, Le Pailleur C, A Vacheron

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Doppler echocardiography has become the method of choice for the evaluation of cardiac valve prostheses. In order to determine the reproducibility of the measurements of pressure gradient and valve surface area, 55 patients with aortic valve prostheses without clinical dysfunction and having at most a trivial regurgitation on color Doppler examination underwent a double evaluation during an average interval of 9 +/- 5 months. The maximum and mean pressure gradients were recorded and the valve surface area calculated using the continuity equation in all cases. The subaortic diameter was taken to be constant and equal to the external diameter of the prosthesis. No significant differences were found between the two evaluations of mean pressure gradient and valve surface area. The intra-patient variability was +/- 8 mmHg for the maximum pressure gradient, +/- 6 mmHg for the mean pressure gradient, +/- 0.33 cm2 for valve surface area calculated using the maximum velocities and +/- 0.44 cm2 when the velocity-time integrals were used. When expressed as a percentage, the mean coefficient of variation was 21 +/- 17% for the maximum pressure gradient, 21 +/- 18% for the mean pressure gradients, 21 +/- 15% for the valve surface area calculated using the maximum velocities and 22 +/- 14% when the ratio of velocity-time integrals was used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Doppler echocardiography has become the method of choice for the evaluation of cardiac valve prostheses. In order to determine the reproducibility of the measurements of pressure gradient and valve surface area, 55 patients with aortic valve prostheses without clinical dysfunction and having at most a trivial regurgitation on color Doppler examination underwent a double evaluation during an average interval of 9 +/- 5 months. The maximum and mean pressure gradients were recorded and the valve surface area calculated using the continuity equation in all cases. The subaortic diameter was taken to be constant and equal to the external diameter of the prosthesis. No significant differences were found between the two evaluations of mean pressure gradient and valve surface area. The intra-patient variability was +/- 8 mmHg for the maximum pressure gradient, +/- 6 mmHg for the mean pressure gradient, +/- 0.33 cm2 for valve surface area calculated using the maximum velocities and +/- 0.44 cm2 when the velocity-time integrals were used. When expressed as a percentage, the mean coefficient of variation was 21 +/- 17% for the maximum pressure gradient, 21 +/- 18% for the mean pressure gradients, 21 +/- 15% for the valve surface area calculated using the maximum velocities and 22 +/- 14% when the ratio of velocity-time integrals was used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Doppler echocardiography has become the method of choice for the evaluation of cardiac valve prostheses. In order to determine the reproducibility of the measurements of pressure gradient and valve surface area, 55 patients with aortic valve prostheses without clinical dysfunction and having at most a trivial regurgitation on color Doppler examination underwent a double evaluation during an average interval of 9 +/- 5 months. The maximum and mean pressure gradients were recorded and the valve surface area calculated using the continuity equation in all cases. The subaortic diameter was taken to be constant and equal to the external diameter of the prosthesis. No significant differences were found between the two evaluations of mean pressure gradient and valve surface area. The intra-patient variability was +/- 8 mmHg for the maximum pressure gradient, +/- 6 mmHg for the mean pressure gradient, +/- 0.33 cm2 for valve surface area calculated using the maximum velocities and +/- 0.44 cm2 when the velocity-time integrals were used. When expressed as a percentage, the mean coefficient of variation was 21 +/- 17% for the maximum pressure gradient, 21 +/- 18% for the mean pressure gradients, 21 +/- 15% for the valve surface area calculated using the maximum velocities and 22 +/- 14% when the ratio of velocity-time integrals was used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Key concepts: Reproducibility, Regurgitation (circulation), Medicine, Pressure gradient, Aortic valve, Prosthesis, Doppler echocardiography, Body surface area

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of aortic valve prosthesis. Analysis of the reproducibility of pressure gradients and surface measurements]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens