2006•PubMedRequires access

[The importance of anamnesis in differential diagnosis of reflex and cardiogenic syncope].

Peter Mitro, Peter T. Kirsch, Z. Zausinova

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of the study was to establish the difference in the anamnestic data in cardiogenic and reflex syncope during a systematic gathering of data using a structured questionnaire and to measure the benefits of structured clinical history in differential diagnosis of syncope. METHODOLOGY: 70 patients with syncope of undetermined etiology (average age 51 years, 26 men and 44 women) underwent a standard diagnostic protocol procedure. Cardiogenic syncope was diagnosed in 16 patients (23%), vasovagal syncope in 34 patients (49%), in 20 patients (28%) the cause of the syncope remained uncertain. Anamnestic data was collected through a structured questionnaire which contained 70 points. OUTCOME: Patients with cardiogenic syncope, as opposed to those with vasovagal syncope, tended to show higher age (68 vs. 43 years, p < 0.001), higher occurrence of IHD (75% vs. 35%, p = 0.008) and hypertension (62% vs. 29%, p = 0.02). Cardiogenic syncope in the prodromal phase exhibited a more frequent feeling of weakness (43% vs. 14%, p = 0.02), absence of the typical provoking factor (56% vs. 15%, p < 0.001), unspecific occurrence during the day (81% vs. 41%, p = 0.008), and weak pulse according to witness report (50% vs. 8%, p = 0.01). There was a significantly higher incidence of visual disturbances in vasovagal syncope in the prodromal phase (47% vs. 19%, p = 0.05) and sweating (29% vs. 6%, p = 0.05), provoking factors often involved long standing on feet (66% vs. 25%, p = 0.01) and hunger (29% vs. 0%, p = 0.01), and paleness was often reported by witnesses as opposed to vasovagal syncope (91% vs. 31%, p = 0.04). The rate of occurrence of palpitation and nausea in the prodromal phase was identical in both types of syncope. CONCLUSION: There exists a significant difference in anamnestic data of patients with cardiogenic syncope and those with vasovagal syncope. Derailed clinical history is a useful method in differential diagnosis of syncope.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

UNLABELLED: The aim of the study was to establish the difference in the anamnestic data in cardiogenic and reflex syncope during a systematic gathering of data using a structured questionnaire and to measure the benefits of structured clinical history in differential diagnosis of syncope. METHODOLOGY: 70 patients with syncope of undetermined etiology (average age 51 years, 26 men and 44 women) underwent a standard diagnostic protocol procedure. Cardiogenic syncope was diagnosed in 16 patients (23%), vasovagal syncope in 34 patients (49%), in 20 patients (28%) the cause of the syncope remained uncertain. Anamnestic data was collected through a structured questionnaire which contained 70 points. OUTCOME: Patients with cardiogenic syncope, as opposed to those with vasovagal syncope, tended to show higher age (68 vs. 43 years, p < 0.001), higher occurrence of IHD (75% vs. 35%, p = 0.008) and hypertension (62% vs. 29%, p = 0.02). Cardiogenic syncope in the prodromal phase exhibited a more frequent feeling of weakness (43% vs. 14%, p = 0.02), absence of the typical provoking factor (56% vs. 15%, p < 0.001), unspecific occurrence during the day (81% vs. 41%, p = 0.008), and weak pulse according to witness report (50% vs. 8%, p = 0.01). There was a significantly higher incidence of visual disturbances in vasovagal syncope in the prodromal phase (47% vs. 19%, p = 0.05) and sweating (29% vs. 6%, p = 0.05), provoking factors often involved long standing on feet (66% vs. 25%, p = 0.01) and hunger (29% vs. 0%, p = 0.01), and paleness was often reported by witnesses as opposed to vasovagal syncope (91% vs. 31%, p = 0.04). The rate of occurrence of palpitation and nausea in the prodromal phase was identical in both types of syncope. CONCLUSION: There exists a significant difference in anamnestic data of patients with cardiogenic syncope and those with vasovagal syncope. Derailed clinical history is a useful method in differential diagnosis of syncope.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of the study was to establish the difference in the anamnestic data in cardiogenic and reflex syncope during a systematic gathering of data using a structured questionnaire and to measure the benefits of structured clinical history in differential diagnosis of syncope. METHODOLOGY: 70 patients with syncope of undetermined etiology (average age 51 years, 26 men and 44 women) underwent a standard diagnostic protocol procedure. Cardiogenic syncope was diagnosed in 16 patients (23%), vasovagal syncope in 34 patients (49%), in 20 patients (28%) the cause of the syncope remained uncertain. Anamnestic data was collected through a structured questionnaire which contained 70 points. OUTCOME: Patients with cardiogenic syncope, as opposed to those with vasovagal syncope, tended to show higher age (68 vs. 43 years, p < 0.001), higher occurrence of IHD (75% vs. 35%, p = 0.008) and hypertension (62% vs. 29%, p = 0.02). Cardiogenic syncope in the prodromal phase exhibited a more frequent feeling of weakness (43% vs. 14%, p = 0.02), absence of the typical provoking factor (56% vs. 15%, p < 0.001), unspecific occurrence during the day (81% vs. 41%, p = 0.008), and weak pulse according to witness report (50% vs. 8%, p = 0.01). There was a significantly higher incidence of visual disturbances in vasovagal syncope in the prodromal phase (47% vs. 19%, p = 0.05) and sweating (29% vs. 6%, p = 0.05), provoking factors often involved long standing on feet (66% vs. 25%, p = 0.01) and hunger (29% vs. 0%, p = 0.01), and paleness was often reported by witnesses as opposed to vasovagal syncope (91% vs. 31%, p = 0.04). The rate of occurrence of palpitation and nausea in the prodromal phase was identical in both types of syncope. CONCLUSION: There exists a significant difference in anamnestic data of patients with cardiogenic syncope and those with vasovagal syncope. Derailed clinical history is a useful method in differential diagnosis of syncope.

Key concepts: Vasovagal syncope, Syncope (phonology), Medicine, Etiology, Internal medicine, Anamnesis, Cardiogenic shock, Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[The importance of anamnesis in differential diagnosis of reflex and cardiogenic syncope]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens