1999•PubMedRequires access

Evaluation of conjugated estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate versus tibolone in early postmenopausal Chinese women.

Tzay‐Shing Yang, S H Tsan, C R Chen, S P Chang, Chiou‐Chung Yuan

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of tibolone (Livial) were compared with the traditional cyclic, sequential conjugated estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate (Premarin/Provera; PP) regimen for the treatment of climacteric symptoms, prevention of postmenopausal bone loss, endometrial stimulation and influence on lipid profile. METHODS: Forty women, one to three years postmenopause, were randomly enrolled in one of two treatment groups, receiving either tibolone (2.5 mg) every day for six months or Premarin (0.625 mg) every day plus Provera (5 mg) from day 1 to day 12 every month for six months. The scores of climacteric complaints, using the Greene Climacteric Scales, and bleeding pattern were recorded at baseline and follow-up visits at months 1, 3 and 6. Bone resorption (deoxypyridinium) and formation (osteocalcin) markers were measured at baseline, three and six months. Lipid profiles, bone density of the lumbar spine and neck of the femur measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry were checked at baseline and six months. RESULTS: Tibolone was as effective as PP in alleviating climacteric complaints. Both regimens were effective in slowing bone metabolism and preventing bone loss. After six months of treatment, bone density of the lumbar spine increased 2.174% in the tibolone group. The endometrium of patients remained atrophic (< 4 mm); only one woman reported vaginal spotting after three months of tibolone therapy. Significant decreases in triglyceride (31.48%) and high-density lipoprotein (29.25%) were also observed. In the PP group, bone density of the lumbar spine increased 1.405%; cyclic withdrawal bleeding occurred in every patient. A significant increase in triglyceride (38.76%) and a significant decrease in low-density lipoprotein (15.10%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Tibolone proved to be effective and safe in the treatment of women with climacteric symptoms and postmenopausal bone loss. As a form of hormone replacement therapy without the need for withdrawal bleeding, tibolone has great appeal to postmenopausal women, and compliance is higher than reported with other forms of hormone replacement therapy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of tibolone (Livial) were compared with the traditional cyclic, sequential conjugated estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate (Premarin/Provera; PP) regimen for the treatment of climacteric symptoms, prevention of postmenopausal bone loss, endometrial stimulation and influence on lipid profile. METHODS: Forty women, one to three years postmenopause, were randomly enrolled in one of two treatment groups, receiving either tibolone (2.5 mg) every day for six months or Premarin (0.625 mg) every day plus Provera (5 mg) from day 1 to day 12 every month for six months. The scores of climacteric complaints, using the Greene Climacteric Scales, and bleeding pattern were recorded at baseline and follow-up visits at months 1, 3 and 6. Bone resorption (deoxypyridinium) and formation (osteocalcin) markers were measured at baseline, three and six months. Lipid profiles, bone density of the lumbar spine and neck of the femur measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry were checked at baseline and six months. RESULTS: Tibolone was as effective as PP in alleviating climacteric complaints. Both regimens were effective in slowing bone metabolism and preventing bone loss. After six months of treatment, bone density of the lumbar spine increased 2.174% in the tibolone group. The endometrium of patients remained atrophic (< 4 mm); only one woman reported vaginal spotting after three months of tibolone therapy. Significant decreases in triglyceride (31.48%) and high-density lipoprotein (29.25%) were also observed. In the PP group, bone density of the lumbar spine increased 1.405%; cyclic withdrawal bleeding occurred in every patient. A significant increase in triglyceride (38.76%) and a significant decrease in low-density lipoprotein (15.10%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Tibolone proved to be effective and safe in the treatment of women with climacteric symptoms and postmenopausal bone loss. As a form of hormone replacement therapy without the need for withdrawal bleeding, tibolone has great appeal to postmenopausal women, and compliance is higher than reported with other forms of hormone replacement therapy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of tibolone (Livial) were compared with the traditional cyclic, sequential conjugated estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate (Premarin/Provera; PP) regimen for the treatment of climacteric symptoms, prevention of postmenopausal bone loss, endometrial stimulation and influence on lipid profile. METHODS: Forty women, one to three years postmenopause, were randomly enrolled in one of two treatment groups, receiving either tibolone (2.5 mg) every day for six months or Premarin (0.625 mg) every day plus Provera (5 mg) from day 1 to day 12 every month for six months. The scores of climacteric complaints, using the Greene Climacteric Scales, and bleeding pattern were recorded at baseline and follow-up visits at months 1, 3 and 6. Bone resorption (deoxypyridinium) and formation (osteocalcin) markers were measured at baseline, three and six months. Lipid profiles, bone density of the lumbar spine and neck of the femur measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry were checked at baseline and six months. RESULTS: Tibolone was as effective as PP in alleviating climacteric complaints. Both regimens were effective in slowing bone metabolism and preventing bone loss. After six months of treatment, bone density of the lumbar spine increased 2.174% in the tibolone group. The endometrium of patients remained atrophic (< 4 mm); only one woman reported vaginal spotting after three months of tibolone therapy. Significant decreases in triglyceride (31.48%) and high-density lipoprotein (29.25%) were also observed. In the PP group, bone density of the lumbar spine increased 1.405%; cyclic withdrawal bleeding occurred in every patient. A significant increase in triglyceride (38.76%) and a significant decrease in low-density lipoprotein (15.10%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Tibolone proved to be effective and safe in the treatment of women with climacteric symptoms and postmenopausal bone loss. As a form of hormone replacement therapy without the need for withdrawal bleeding, tibolone has great appeal to postmenopausal women, and compliance is higher than reported with other forms of hormone replacement therapy.

Key concepts: Tibolone, Medicine, Climacteric, Medroxyprogesterone acetate, Menopause, Medroxyprogesterone, Bone density, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of conjugated estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate versus tibolone in early postmenopausal Chinese women. — Research Paper | ScholarLens