1977•PubMedRequires access

Comparison of clofibrate with halofenate in diabetics with hyperlipidaemia.

Krut Lh, Seftel Hc, B I Joffe

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

In a double-blind, randomized study which lasted 48 weeks the effects of clofibrate and halofenate were compared in maturity-onset diabetics with hyperlipidaemia. With the use of both clofibrate and halofenate serum cholesterol values were lowered only slightly. Both agents significantly reduced triglyceride values, but the decreases were modest and transient. Both drugs significantly lowered serum urate values, although the effect of halofenate was distinctly greater. Halofenate, but not clofibrate, had a considerable hypoglycaemic effect on the patients, most of whom were also receiving oral antidiabetic medicines. The drugs produced a number of clinical and biochemical adverse reactions, and in about 20% of all patients the trial had to be discontinued prematurely. The management of hyperlipidaemia in maturity-onset diabetics is briefly discussed, and it is concluded that neither clofibrate nor halofenate is to be recommended.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In a double-blind, randomized study which lasted 48 weeks the effects of clofibrate and halofenate were compared in maturity-onset diabetics with hyperlipidaemia. With the use of both clofibrate and halofenate serum cholesterol values were lowered only slightly. Both agents significantly reduced triglyceride values, but the decreases were modest and transient. Both drugs significantly lowered serum urate values, although the effect of halofenate was distinctly greater. Halofenate, but not clofibrate, had a considerable hypoglycaemic effect on the patients, most of whom were also receiving oral antidiabetic medicines. The drugs produced a number of clinical and biochemical adverse reactions, and in about 20% of all patients the trial had to be discontinued prematurely. The management of hyperlipidaemia in maturity-onset diabetics is briefly discussed, and it is concluded that neither clofibrate nor halofenate is to be recommended.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In a double-blind, randomized study which lasted 48 weeks the effects of clofibrate and halofenate were compared in maturity-onset diabetics with hyperlipidaemia. With the use of both clofibrate and halofenate serum cholesterol values were lowered only slightly. Both agents significantly reduced triglyceride values, but the decreases were modest and transient. Both drugs significantly lowered serum urate values, although the effect of halofenate was distinctly greater. Halofenate, but not clofibrate, had a considerable hypoglycaemic effect on the patients, most of whom were also receiving oral antidiabetic medicines. The drugs produced a number of clinical and biochemical adverse reactions, and in about 20% of all patients the trial had to be discontinued prematurely. The management of hyperlipidaemia in maturity-onset diabetics is briefly discussed, and it is concluded that neither clofibrate nor halofenate is to be recommended.

Key concepts: Clofibrate, Medicine, Internal medicine, Triglyceride, Hyperlipidemia, Serum cholesterol, Endocrinology, Cholesterol

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of clofibrate with halofenate in diabetics with hyperlipidaemia. — Research Paper | ScholarLens