[Comparison of two schemes of administering the Russian protamine sulfate after extracorporeal circulation in cardiosurgical patients].
Charnaia Ma, Iu A Morozov, Gladysheva Vg, Isaeva Am
Abstract
Charnaia Ma, Iu A Morozov, Gladysheva Vg, Isaeva Am
Abstract
The paper presents data of a study comparing two schemes (Scheme 1: a heparin/protamine ratio of 1:2; Scheme 2: a heparin/protamine ratio of 1:3) for administering protamine sulfate to neutralize heparin in patients after extracorporeal circulation. A larger dose of protamine sulfate is shown to induce significant thrombocytic dysfunction, resulting in increased postoperative hemorrhage. To minimize protamine sulfate doses required for neutralization of the anticoagulant effect of heparin is a way of preventing these complications.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The paper presents data of a study comparing two schemes (Scheme 1: a heparin/protamine ratio of 1:2; Scheme 2: a heparin/protamine ratio of 1:3) for administering protamine sulfate to neutralize heparin in patients after extracorporeal circulation. A larger dose of protamine sulfate is shown to induce significant thrombocytic dysfunction, resulting in increased postoperative hemorrhage. To minimize protamine sulfate doses required for neutralization of the anticoagulant effect of heparin is a way of preventing these complications.
Key concepts: Protamine sulfate, Protamine, Heparin, Medicine, Extracorporeal circulation, Anticoagulant, Pharmacology, Anesthesia