1968Journal of Animal ScienceRequires access

Influence of Hay or Silage and Ratio of Flaked Corn or Beet Pulp to Forage on Cellulose Disappearance

M.E. McCullough

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

Diets of corn silage and hay fed with flaked corn or beet pulp supplements in grain to forage ratios of 20:80, 40:60, 60:40 and 80:20 were fed to steers with rumen fistulas. Rumen fluid from these steers was used to ferment similar diets in artificial rumina to measure diet influences on cellulose disappearance. The results indicate that coastal bermuda hay was superior to corn silage in maintaining high levels of cellulose disappearance with high levels of grain feeding. With both silage and hay, beet pulp was superior to flaked corn although each grain and each forage appeared to have an optimum grain to forage ratio. The higher ratios of grain in the corn silage rations fed the steers resulted in rumen fluid with lower pH than similar grain rations with hay. The rumen fluid with lower pH resulted in smaller losses of cellulose in vitro. This result is interpreted to indicate that rations which produce a low pH in the rumen result in a decreased population of cellulytic microorganisms.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Diets of corn silage and hay fed with flaked corn or beet pulp supplements in grain to forage ratios of 20:80, 40:60, 60:40 and 80:20 were fed to steers with rumen fistulas. Rumen fluid from these steers was used to ferment similar diets in artificial rumina to measure diet influences on cellulose disappearance. The results indicate that coastal bermuda hay was superior to corn silage in maintaining high levels of cellulose disappearance with high levels of grain feeding. With both silage and hay, beet pulp was superior to flaked corn although each grain and each forage appeared to have an optimum grain to forage ratio. The higher ratios of grain in the corn silage rations fed the steers resulted in rumen fluid with lower pH than similar grain rations with hay. The rumen fluid with lower pH resulted in smaller losses of cellulose in vitro. This result is interpreted to indicate that rations which produce a low pH in the rumen result in a decreased population of cellulytic microorganisms.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Diets of corn silage and hay fed with flaked corn or beet pulp supplements in grain to forage ratios of 20:80, 40:60, 60:40 and 80:20 were fed to steers with rumen fistulas. Rumen fluid from these steers was used to ferment similar diets in artificial rumina to measure diet influences on cellulose disappearance. The results indicate that coastal bermuda hay was superior to corn silage in maintaining high levels of cellulose disappearance with high levels of grain feeding. With both silage and hay, beet pulp was superior to flaked corn although each grain and each forage appeared to have an optimum grain to forage ratio. The higher ratios of grain in the corn silage rations fed the steers resulted in rumen fluid with lower pH than similar grain rations with hay. The rumen fluid with lower pH resulted in smaller losses of cellulose in vitro. This result is interpreted to indicate that rations which produce a low pH in the rumen result in a decreased population of cellulytic microorganisms.

Key concepts: Silage, Rumen, Hay, Forage, Beet pulp, Agronomy, Cellulose, Alfalfa hay

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Influence of Hay or Silage and Ratio of Flaked Corn or Beet Pulp to Forage on Cellulose Disappearance — Research Paper | ScholarLens