1987•PubMedRequires access

[Allergy diet: procedures in diagnosis and therapy of food allergy and pseudo-allergy].

Johannes Ring, Otto Braun‐Falco

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Apart from patient history, skin tests and in vitro methods, certain in vivo techniques such as elimination or provocation tests are of great importance in the diagnosis of food allergy. A variety of dietary approaches are used: elimination diets allow the evaluation of clinical improvement after the stepwise removal of suspected foods; on the other hand, provocation diets involve introducing suspected allergenic foods under clinical control. In each individual patient, a specific selection of food provocations is desirable. Food additives are tested according to the schedule of the oral provocation test for idiosyncrasy (OPTI) by the administration of increasing doses in gelatine capsules. In order to rule out psychological influences, blind techniques should be used. For longer periods, three variably intense allergy diets are recommended: Allergy diet 1 ("allergen-free" diet) is used in patients with severe clinical symptoms over a period of up to 2 weeks. Allergy diet 2 (allergen-poor diet) consists of a positively defined mixture of few permitted foods empirically rated as being weak allergens; this diet is suitable as a baseline diet over longer periods of time in patients with marked hypersensitivity reactions. Allergy diet 3 (additive-free diet) distinguishes permitted and prohibited foods. This diet is recommended for patients with pseudo-allergic reactions to additives such as colouring, preservatives or other triggers of pseudo-allergic reactions. In all dietary procedures, the problem of compliance has to be considered, not only with respect to the patient but also with regard to the medical personnel.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Apart from patient history, skin tests and in vitro methods, certain in vivo techniques such as elimination or provocation tests are of great importance in the diagnosis of food allergy. A variety of dietary approaches are used: elimination diets allow the evaluation of clinical improvement after the stepwise removal of suspected foods; on the other hand, provocation diets involve introducing suspected allergenic foods under clinical control. In each individual patient, a specific selection of food provocations is desirable. Food additives are tested according to the schedule of the oral provocation test for idiosyncrasy (OPTI) by the administration of increasing doses in gelatine capsules. In order to rule out psychological influences, blind techniques should be used. For longer periods, three variably intense allergy diets are recommended: Allergy diet 1 ("allergen-free" diet) is used in patients with severe clinical symptoms over a period of up to 2 weeks. Allergy diet 2 (allergen-poor diet) consists of a positively defined mixture of few permitted foods empirically rated as being weak allergens; this diet is suitable as a baseline diet over longer periods of time in patients with marked hypersensitivity reactions. Allergy diet 3 (additive-free diet) distinguishes permitted and prohibited foods. This diet is recommended for patients with pseudo-allergic reactions to additives such as colouring, preservatives or other triggers of pseudo-allergic reactions. In all dietary procedures, the problem of compliance has to be considered, not only with respect to the patient but also with regard to the medical personnel.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Apart from patient history, skin tests and in vitro methods, certain in vivo techniques such as elimination or provocation tests are of great importance in the diagnosis of food allergy. A variety of dietary approaches are used: elimination diets allow the evaluation of clinical improvement after the stepwise removal of suspected foods; on the other hand, provocation diets involve introducing suspected allergenic foods under clinical control. In each individual patient, a specific selection of food provocations is desirable. Food additives are tested according to the schedule of the oral provocation test for idiosyncrasy (OPTI) by the administration of increasing doses in gelatine capsules. In order to rule out psychological influences, blind techniques should be used. For longer periods, three variably intense allergy diets are recommended: Allergy diet 1 ("allergen-free" diet) is used in patients with severe clinical symptoms over a period of up to 2 weeks. Allergy diet 2 (allergen-poor diet) consists of a positively defined mixture of few permitted foods empirically rated as being weak allergens; this diet is suitable as a baseline diet over longer periods of time in patients with marked hypersensitivity reactions. Allergy diet 3 (additive-free diet) distinguishes permitted and prohibited foods. This diet is recommended for patients with pseudo-allergic reactions to additives such as colouring, preservatives or other triggers of pseudo-allergic reactions. In all dietary procedures, the problem of compliance has to be considered, not only with respect to the patient but also with regard to the medical personnel.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Key concepts: Provocation test, Medicine, Allergy, Food allergy, Allergen, Elimination diet, Dermatology, Immunology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Allergy diet: procedures in diagnosis and therapy of food allergy and pseudo-allergy]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens