2008•PubMedRequires access

Effectiveness of primer and bond in sealant retention and caries prevention.

Ana Karina Mascarenhas, Huda Nazar, S Al-Mutawaa, Pramod M. Soparkar

Open publisher page 35 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical trial was to test the use of a primer and bonding agent to increase the retention of a fissuresealant in a group of Kuwaiti children. METHODS: In 78 6- to 9-year-old children who required sealants in all 4 permanent frst molars, sealants were placed in 2 teeth using a primer and bond (3M Scotch Bond) and in 2 teeth without primer and bond. Sealant retention was evaluated 1 and 2 years later. Sealant retention was scored as: (1) complete retention; (2) partial loss of sealant; and (3) complete loss of sealant Caries was scored for those teeth in which the sealant was partially or completely lost RESULTS: At the 2-year examination, in teeth sealed with primer and bond (a) 64% of the sealants were completely retained; (b) 23% were partially lost; and (c) 13% were completely lost. In teeth sealed without primer and bond: (a) 68% of the sealants were completely retained; (b) 20% were partially lost; and (c) 12% were completely lost There was no difference in sealant retention (P=.22) and caries (P=.56) in teeth sealed with and without bond. In multivariate analyses after controlling for age, gender, tooth surface, and arch, no differences in sealant retention and caries were seen. CONCLUSION: If a proper technique is used in sealant placement, primer and bond does not enhance sealant retention.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical trial was to test the use of a primer and bonding agent to increase the retention of a fissuresealant in a group of Kuwaiti children. METHODS: In 78 6- to 9-year-old children who required sealants in all 4 permanent frst molars, sealants were placed in 2 teeth using a primer and bond (3M Scotch Bond) and in 2 teeth without primer and bond. Sealant retention was evaluated 1 and 2 years later. Sealant retention was scored as: (1) complete retention; (2) partial loss of sealant; and (3) complete loss of sealant Caries was scored for those teeth in which the sealant was partially or completely lost RESULTS: At the 2-year examination, in teeth sealed with primer and bond (a) 64% of the sealants were completely retained; (b) 23% were partially lost; and (c) 13% were completely lost. In teeth sealed without primer and bond: (a) 68% of the sealants were completely retained; (b) 20% were partially lost; and (c) 12% were completely lost There was no difference in sealant retention (P=.22) and caries (P=.56) in teeth sealed with and without bond. In multivariate analyses after controlling for age, gender, tooth surface, and arch, no differences in sealant retention and caries were seen. CONCLUSION: If a proper technique is used in sealant placement, primer and bond does not enhance sealant retention.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical trial was to test the use of a primer and bonding agent to increase the retention of a fissuresealant in a group of Kuwaiti children. METHODS: In 78 6- to 9-year-old children who required sealants in all 4 permanent frst molars, sealants were placed in 2 teeth using a primer and bond (3M Scotch Bond) and in 2 teeth without primer and bond. Sealant retention was evaluated 1 and 2 years later. Sealant retention was scored as: (1) complete retention; (2) partial loss of sealant; and (3) complete loss of sealant Caries was scored for those teeth in which the sealant was partially or completely lost RESULTS: At the 2-year examination, in teeth sealed with primer and bond (a) 64% of the sealants were completely retained; (b) 23% were partially lost; and (c) 13% were completely lost. In teeth sealed without primer and bond: (a) 68% of the sealants were completely retained; (b) 20% were partially lost; and (c) 12% were completely lost There was no difference in sealant retention (P=.22) and caries (P=.56) in teeth sealed with and without bond. In multivariate analyses after controlling for age, gender, tooth surface, and arch, no differences in sealant retention and caries were seen. CONCLUSION: If a proper technique is used in sealant placement, primer and bond does not enhance sealant retention.

Key concepts: Sealant, Dentistry, Medicine, Primer (cosmetics), Molar, Orthodontics, Composite material, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effectiveness of primer and bond in sealant retention and caries prevention. — Research Paper | ScholarLens