Assessment of the ear and otoacoustic emission findings in fibromyalgia syndrome.
Metin Yılmaz, Elif Baysal, Bülent Gündüz, Ayşe Esra Koku Aksu, Nuray Ensari, Jale Meray, Bayazit Ya
Abstract
Metin Yılmaz, Elif Baysal, Bülent Gündüz, Ayşe Esra Koku Aksu, Nuray Ensari, Jale Meray, Bayazit Ya
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess otoacoustic emission (OAE) findings in fibromyalgia (FM) syndrome. METHODS: Thirty-two ears of 16 female patients with FM syndrome and 30 ears of 15 healthy female controls were also included in the study. Pure tone audiometry, speech discrimination testing, tympanometry and otoacoustic emission testing (both transiently evoked and distortion product) were performed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the pure tone hearing results of the patients and controls (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the distortion-product-otoacoustic emission results of the patients and controls. Audiologic findings of the patients with and without otologic symptoms were not significantly different than controls (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although FM patients generally have subjective symptoms related to ear, clinical or laboratory assessments usually fail to find out any objective finding related to these subjective symptoms. The otologic functions seem spared in FM syndrome.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess otoacoustic emission (OAE) findings in fibromyalgia (FM) syndrome. METHODS: Thirty-two ears of 16 female patients with FM syndrome and 30 ears of 15 healthy female controls were also included in the study. Pure tone audiometry, speech discrimination testing, tympanometry and otoacoustic emission testing (both transiently evoked and distortion product) were performed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the pure tone hearing results of the patients and controls (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the distortion-product-otoacoustic emission results of the patients and controls. Audiologic findings of the patients with and without otologic symptoms were not significantly different than controls (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although FM patients generally have subjective symptoms related to ear, clinical or laboratory assessments usually fail to find out any objective finding related to these subjective symptoms. The otologic functions seem spared in FM syndrome.
Key concepts: Medicine, Otoacoustic emission, Tympanometry, Audiology, Audiometry, Pure tone audiometry, Hearing loss