2009PubMedRequires access

[Liver transplantation in end-stage liver disease with portal vein thrombosis].

Wu G, Liu Yf, Shu-rong Liu, Zhang Jl, Chen Xc, Cheng Dh

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the experience in the managements of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and to evaluate the impact of PVT on intraoperative course and postoperative outcome in liver transplantation. METHODS: Between May 1995 and September 2007, 194 orthotopic liver transplantations were performed, of which 24 cases presented portal vein thrombosis. There were 12 patients with grade I, 9 with grade II, 2 with grade III and 1 with grade IV. The management of PVT depended mainly on its extent. Ligation of the collateral circulation, especially spontaneous or surgical splenorenal shunt, was made as approaches to improve portal flow.Heparin or low-molecule-weight heparin as a prophylactic anticoagulation therapy was maintained during and after operation if prothrombin time is less than eighteen seconds. Follow-up Doppler ultrasonography was used daily in the early postoperative period. Risk factors and variables associated with the transplant and the post-transplant period were analyzed and compared with 170 patients transplanted without PVT. RESULTS: Surgical techniques were eversion thromboendovenectomy in 21 patients with PVT grades I and II, extra-anatomic mesenteric graft in 2 with grade III, and anastomosis to a collateral vein in 1 with grade IV. The study demonstrated more RBC transfusions [(15.2 +/- 11.8) U vs. (8.6 +/- 6.6) U, P = 0.006], longer surgery procedures [(492 +/- 89) min vs. (403 +/- 105) min, P = 0.001] and hospital stay [(32.4 +/- 13.5) d vs. (22.1 +/- 9.1) d, P = 0.001] in the PVT group. However, there were no differences in overall morbidity (58.3% vs. 50.6%, P = 0.478), hospital mortality (8.3% vs.6.5%, P = 0.73) and 1-year survival (87.5% vs. 89.4%, P = 0.778). The incidence of rethrombosis was higher in the PVT group (8.3% vs.1.2%, P = 0.021). Two cases rethrombosis were successfully cured by percutaneous thrombolysis, balloon angioplasty, and stent placement. CONCLUSION: Portal thrombosis is associated with greater operative complexity and rethrombosis, but has no influence on overall morbidity and mortality in liver transplantation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the experience in the managements of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and to evaluate the impact of PVT on intraoperative course and postoperative outcome in liver transplantation. METHODS: Between May 1995 and September 2007, 194 orthotopic liver transplantations were performed, of which 24 cases presented portal vein thrombosis. There were 12 patients with grade I, 9 with grade II, 2 with grade III and 1 with grade IV. The management of PVT depended mainly on its extent. Ligation of the collateral circulation, especially spontaneous or surgical splenorenal shunt, was made as approaches to improve portal flow.Heparin or low-molecule-weight heparin as a prophylactic anticoagulation therapy was maintained during and after operation if prothrombin time is less than eighteen seconds. Follow-up Doppler ultrasonography was used daily in the early postoperative period. Risk factors and variables associated with the transplant and the post-transplant period were analyzed and compared with 170 patients transplanted without PVT. RESULTS: Surgical techniques were eversion thromboendovenectomy in 21 patients with PVT grades I and II, extra-anatomic mesenteric graft in 2 with grade III, and anastomosis to a collateral vein in 1 with grade IV. The study demonstrated more RBC transfusions [(15.2 +/- 11.8) U vs. (8.6 +/- 6.6) U, P = 0.006], longer surgery procedures [(492 +/- 89) min vs. (403 +/- 105) min, P = 0.001] and hospital stay [(32.4 +/- 13.5) d vs. (22.1 +/- 9.1) d, P = 0.001] in the PVT group. However, there were no differences in overall morbidity (58.3% vs. 50.6%, P = 0.478), hospital mortality (8.3% vs.6.5%, P = 0.73) and 1-year survival (87.5% vs. 89.4%, P = 0.778). The incidence of rethrombosis was higher in the PVT group (8.3% vs.1.2%, P = 0.021). Two cases rethrombosis were successfully cured by percutaneous thrombolysis, balloon angioplasty, and stent placement. CONCLUSION: Portal thrombosis is associated with greater operative complexity and rethrombosis, but has no influence on overall morbidity and mortality in liver transplantation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the experience in the managements of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and to evaluate the impact of PVT on intraoperative course and postoperative outcome in liver transplantation. METHODS: Between May 1995 and September 2007, 194 orthotopic liver transplantations were performed, of which 24 cases presented portal vein thrombosis. There were 12 patients with grade I, 9 with grade II, 2 with grade III and 1 with grade IV. The management of PVT depended mainly on its extent. Ligation of the collateral circulation, especially spontaneous or surgical splenorenal shunt, was made as approaches to improve portal flow.Heparin or low-molecule-weight heparin as a prophylactic anticoagulation therapy was maintained during and after operation if prothrombin time is less than eighteen seconds. Follow-up Doppler ultrasonography was used daily in the early postoperative period. Risk factors and variables associated with the transplant and the post-transplant period were analyzed and compared with 170 patients transplanted without PVT. RESULTS: Surgical techniques were eversion thromboendovenectomy in 21 patients with PVT grades I and II, extra-anatomic mesenteric graft in 2 with grade III, and anastomosis to a collateral vein in 1 with grade IV. The study demonstrated more RBC transfusions [(15.2 +/- 11.8) U vs. (8.6 +/- 6.6) U, P = 0.006], longer surgery procedures [(492 +/- 89) min vs. (403 +/- 105) min, P = 0.001] and hospital stay [(32.4 +/- 13.5) d vs. (22.1 +/- 9.1) d, P = 0.001] in the PVT group. However, there were no differences in overall morbidity (58.3% vs. 50.6%, P = 0.478), hospital mortality (8.3% vs.6.5%, P = 0.73) and 1-year survival (87.5% vs. 89.4%, P = 0.778). The incidence of rethrombosis was higher in the PVT group (8.3% vs.1.2%, P = 0.021). Two cases rethrombosis were successfully cured by percutaneous thrombolysis, balloon angioplasty, and stent placement. CONCLUSION: Portal thrombosis is associated with greater operative complexity and rethrombosis, but has no influence on overall morbidity and mortality in liver transplantation.

Key concepts: Medicine, Portal vein thrombosis, Surgery, Liver transplantation, Thrombosis, Anastomosis, Heparin, Collateral circulation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Liver transplantation in end-stage liver disease with portal vein thrombosis]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens