1997PubMedRequires access

Preoperative versus postoperative pethidine for extraction of impacted third molars.

Sophia Tsong Huey Chew, T. C. Low

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

We have studied the pre-emptive analgesic effects of pethidine by comparing its analgesic effects given before or immediately after operation in a randomized, double-blind study of 40 patients undergoing removal of bilateral impacted third molars under general anaesthesia. Group 1 patients received pethidine 50 mg as a 1 ml injection 1 to 2 hours before operation and normal saline 1 ml intramuscularly immediately after surgery. Group 2 patients received normal saline 1 ml intramuscularly before operation and pethidine 50 mg as a 1 ml injection immediately after surgery. Outcome measures included perception of pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS), the number of patients who required postoperative pethidine, time to first postoperative pethidine injection and total dose of pethidine given. Four patients in group 1 compared to 8 in group 2 required postoperative pethidine but this was not statistically significant. The VAS scores, time to first postoperative pethidine injection and total dose of pethidine also did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. We concluded that preoperative administration of pethidine intramuscularly did not confer additional analgesic effects compared with a similar dose given after surgery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We have studied the pre-emptive analgesic effects of pethidine by comparing its analgesic effects given before or immediately after operation in a randomized, double-blind study of 40 patients undergoing removal of bilateral impacted third molars under general anaesthesia. Group 1 patients received pethidine 50 mg as a 1 ml injection 1 to 2 hours before operation and normal saline 1 ml intramuscularly immediately after surgery. Group 2 patients received normal saline 1 ml intramuscularly before operation and pethidine 50 mg as a 1 ml injection immediately after surgery. Outcome measures included perception of pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS), the number of patients who required postoperative pethidine, time to first postoperative pethidine injection and total dose of pethidine given. Four patients in group 1 compared to 8 in group 2 required postoperative pethidine but this was not statistically significant. The VAS scores, time to first postoperative pethidine injection and total dose of pethidine also did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. We concluded that preoperative administration of pethidine intramuscularly did not confer additional analgesic effects compared with a similar dose given after surgery.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We have studied the pre-emptive analgesic effects of pethidine by comparing its analgesic effects given before or immediately after operation in a randomized, double-blind study of 40 patients undergoing removal of bilateral impacted third molars under general anaesthesia. Group 1 patients received pethidine 50 mg as a 1 ml injection 1 to 2 hours before operation and normal saline 1 ml intramuscularly immediately after surgery. Group 2 patients received normal saline 1 ml intramuscularly before operation and pethidine 50 mg as a 1 ml injection immediately after surgery. Outcome measures included perception of pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS), the number of patients who required postoperative pethidine, time to first postoperative pethidine injection and total dose of pethidine given. Four patients in group 1 compared to 8 in group 2 required postoperative pethidine but this was not statistically significant. The VAS scores, time to first postoperative pethidine injection and total dose of pethidine also did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. We concluded that preoperative administration of pethidine intramuscularly did not confer additional analgesic effects compared with a similar dose given after surgery.

Key concepts: Pethidine, Medicine, Anesthesia, Visual analogue scale, Analgesic, Saline, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Preoperative versus postoperative pethidine for extraction of impacted third molars. — Research Paper | ScholarLens