Preoperative versus postoperative pethidine for extraction of impacted third molars.
Sophia Tsong Huey Chew, T. C. Low
Abstract
Sophia Tsong Huey Chew, T. C. Low
Abstract
We have studied the pre-emptive analgesic effects of pethidine by comparing its analgesic effects given before or immediately after operation in a randomized, double-blind study of 40 patients undergoing removal of bilateral impacted third molars under general anaesthesia. Group 1 patients received pethidine 50 mg as a 1 ml injection 1 to 2 hours before operation and normal saline 1 ml intramuscularly immediately after surgery. Group 2 patients received normal saline 1 ml intramuscularly before operation and pethidine 50 mg as a 1 ml injection immediately after surgery. Outcome measures included perception of pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS), the number of patients who required postoperative pethidine, time to first postoperative pethidine injection and total dose of pethidine given. Four patients in group 1 compared to 8 in group 2 required postoperative pethidine but this was not statistically significant. The VAS scores, time to first postoperative pethidine injection and total dose of pethidine also did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. We concluded that preoperative administration of pethidine intramuscularly did not confer additional analgesic effects compared with a similar dose given after surgery.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We have studied the pre-emptive analgesic effects of pethidine by comparing its analgesic effects given before or immediately after operation in a randomized, double-blind study of 40 patients undergoing removal of bilateral impacted third molars under general anaesthesia. Group 1 patients received pethidine 50 mg as a 1 ml injection 1 to 2 hours before operation and normal saline 1 ml intramuscularly immediately after surgery. Group 2 patients received normal saline 1 ml intramuscularly before operation and pethidine 50 mg as a 1 ml injection immediately after surgery. Outcome measures included perception of pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS), the number of patients who required postoperative pethidine, time to first postoperative pethidine injection and total dose of pethidine given. Four patients in group 1 compared to 8 in group 2 required postoperative pethidine but this was not statistically significant. The VAS scores, time to first postoperative pethidine injection and total dose of pethidine also did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. We concluded that preoperative administration of pethidine intramuscularly did not confer additional analgesic effects compared with a similar dose given after surgery.
Key concepts: Pethidine, Medicine, Anesthesia, Visual analogue scale, Analgesic, Saline, Surgery