The Flynn Effect: A Quantitative Commentary on Modernity and Human Intelligence
Cameron M. Clark, Linette Lawlor‐Savage, Vina M. Goghari
Abstract
Cameron M. Clark, Linette Lawlor‐Savage, Vina M. Goghari
Abstract
Average intelligence quotient (IQ) scores have been rising throughout the 20th century and likely before—a pattern now known as the Flynn effect. The central thesis of this paper is that the Flynn effect does not represent genuine increases in general intelligence but rather an increasing aptitude for the types of modern thinking that modern life requires and that IQ tests measure. Several lines of evidence are discussed in favor of this view. Implications for the theory of intelligence, recent history, and the human mind, more generally, are discussed.
OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Average intelligence quotient (IQ) scores have been rising throughout the 20th century and likely before—a pattern now known as the Flynn effect. The central thesis of this paper is that the Flynn effect does not represent genuine increases in general intelligence but rather an increasing aptitude for the types of modern thinking that modern life requires and that IQ tests measure. Several lines of evidence are discussed in favor of this view. Implications for the theory of intelligence, recent history, and the human mind, more generally, are discussed.
Key concepts: Human intelligence, Intelligence quotient, Aptitude, Modernity, Psychology, Cognitive psychology, Epistemology, Developmental psychology