1991PubMedRequires access

Urea monitoring during dialysis: the wave of the future. A tale of two cities.

Lindsay Rm, Heidenheim Ap, E Spanner, J. Kevin Baird, K. Simpson, Allison Me

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

The National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS) suggested that the removal of small molecules controls the adequacy of the dialysis prescription, and it would seem appropriate that renal units regularly carry out formal urea kinetic modeling to ensure that the adequacy of dialysis is provided. Current methods of calculating Kt/V (urea) are complex and require the accurate measurement of dialyzer urea clearance and calculation of the volume of distribution of urea. This may be done by the direct measurement of total urea removed or by the use of computer programs that examine plasma urea and weight changes over time. Both methods have inherent problems, and this has stimulated the search for easier "bedside" formulas for the calculation of Kt/V. These newer formulas involve examination of the percentage reduction in blood urea concentration during hemodialysis. Two such formulas were examined and applied to 78 patients undergoing hemodialysis in two centers. One center routinely carried out formal urea kinetic modeling; the other did not. In the first center, it was found that the majority of patients were receiving more dialysis than necessary to achieve Kt/V (urea) = 1 when the latter was judged by those formulas. This suggested the possibility of time savings, with considerable implications for cost efficiency. In the second center, the majority of patients required more dialysis. It was concluded that intermittent formal urea kinetic modeling tends to overshoot the necessary prescription to allow for occasional "imperfect" dialyses and also that it is impossible to base dialysis prescriptions on routine pre-dialysis blood work and a "feel" for patients' needs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS) suggested that the removal of small molecules controls the adequacy of the dialysis prescription, and it would seem appropriate that renal units regularly carry out formal urea kinetic modeling to ensure that the adequacy of dialysis is provided. Current methods of calculating Kt/V (urea) are complex and require the accurate measurement of dialyzer urea clearance and calculation of the volume of distribution of urea. This may be done by the direct measurement of total urea removed or by the use of computer programs that examine plasma urea and weight changes over time. Both methods have inherent problems, and this has stimulated the search for easier "bedside" formulas for the calculation of Kt/V. These newer formulas involve examination of the percentage reduction in blood urea concentration during hemodialysis. Two such formulas were examined and applied to 78 patients undergoing hemodialysis in two centers. One center routinely carried out formal urea kinetic modeling; the other did not. In the first center, it was found that the majority of patients were receiving more dialysis than necessary to achieve Kt/V (urea) = 1 when the latter was judged by those formulas. This suggested the possibility of time savings, with considerable implications for cost efficiency. In the second center, the majority of patients required more dialysis. It was concluded that intermittent formal urea kinetic modeling tends to overshoot the necessary prescription to allow for occasional "imperfect" dialyses and also that it is impossible to base dialysis prescriptions on routine pre-dialysis blood work and a "feel" for patients' needs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS) suggested that the removal of small molecules controls the adequacy of the dialysis prescription, and it would seem appropriate that renal units regularly carry out formal urea kinetic modeling to ensure that the adequacy of dialysis is provided. Current methods of calculating Kt/V (urea) are complex and require the accurate measurement of dialyzer urea clearance and calculation of the volume of distribution of urea. This may be done by the direct measurement of total urea removed or by the use of computer programs that examine plasma urea and weight changes over time. Both methods have inherent problems, and this has stimulated the search for easier "bedside" formulas for the calculation of Kt/V. These newer formulas involve examination of the percentage reduction in blood urea concentration during hemodialysis. Two such formulas were examined and applied to 78 patients undergoing hemodialysis in two centers. One center routinely carried out formal urea kinetic modeling; the other did not. In the first center, it was found that the majority of patients were receiving more dialysis than necessary to achieve Kt/V (urea) = 1 when the latter was judged by those formulas. This suggested the possibility of time savings, with considerable implications for cost efficiency. In the second center, the majority of patients required more dialysis. It was concluded that intermittent formal urea kinetic modeling tends to overshoot the necessary prescription to allow for occasional "imperfect" dialyses and also that it is impossible to base dialysis prescriptions on routine pre-dialysis blood work and a "feel" for patients' needs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Key concepts: Dialysis, Urea, Hemodialysis, Dialysis adequacy, Kt/V, Medical prescription, Medicine, Intensive care medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Urea monitoring during dialysis: the wave of the future. A tale of two cities. — Research Paper | ScholarLens