Gallbladder examinations: a comparison between sonography and radiography.
Claudia Krebs, Joseph Carson
Abstract
Claudia Krebs, Joseph Carson
Abstract
For the past 50 years, oral cholecystography has been the standard study of radiographic evaluation of the gallbladder with a 98% accuracy level. In the last few years, ultrasound has achieved a similar degree of accuracy; this newer imaging modality has been predicted by some experts to soon become the initial procedure for gallbladder evaluation. It is essential to become aware of the advantages and disadvantages of both oral cholecystography and abdominal ultrasound to be able to use both of them to the best diagnostic advantage.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
For the past 50 years, oral cholecystography has been the standard study of radiographic evaluation of the gallbladder with a 98% accuracy level. In the last few years, ultrasound has achieved a similar degree of accuracy; this newer imaging modality has been predicted by some experts to soon become the initial procedure for gallbladder evaluation. It is essential to become aware of the advantages and disadvantages of both oral cholecystography and abdominal ultrasound to be able to use both of them to the best diagnostic advantage.
Key concepts: Cholecystography, Gallbladder, Medicine, Radiology, Ultrasound, Radiography, Abdominal ultrasound, Modality (human–computer interaction)