1981•Thrombosis and HaemostasisRequires access

Plasmin Potency Estimates: Influence of the Substrate Used in Assay

Roger D. Philo, Patrick J. Gaffney

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

A urokinase-activated plasmin (UK-plasmin) preparation was assayed against the International Reference Preparation for Plasmin (IRP-plasmin) using caseinolytic, fibrinolytic, fibrinogenolytic and chromogenic assay methods. The relative potency (using multi-dose bioassays) was estimated by the fibrinolytic method to be about twice that obtained by the caseinolytic, fibrinolytic and chromogenic assay methods. It was found that the UK-plasmin binds to fibrin to a greater extent than does the IRP-plasmin and this is advanced as an explanation for the discrepancy between assay methods. This difference in the binding of the two plasmins to fibrin may mean that it will be difficult to compare the fibrinolytic activities of various plasmin preparations. It is also shown that, during thermal degradation, the IRP-plasmin loses fibrinolytic activity more rapidly than amidolytic activity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A urokinase-activated plasmin (UK-plasmin) preparation was assayed against the International Reference Preparation for Plasmin (IRP-plasmin) using caseinolytic, fibrinolytic, fibrinogenolytic and chromogenic assay methods. The relative potency (using multi-dose bioassays) was estimated by the fibrinolytic method to be about twice that obtained by the caseinolytic, fibrinolytic and chromogenic assay methods. It was found that the UK-plasmin binds to fibrin to a greater extent than does the IRP-plasmin and this is advanced as an explanation for the discrepancy between assay methods. This difference in the binding of the two plasmins to fibrin may mean that it will be difficult to compare the fibrinolytic activities of various plasmin preparations. It is also shown that, during thermal degradation, the IRP-plasmin loses fibrinolytic activity more rapidly than amidolytic activity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A urokinase-activated plasmin (UK-plasmin) preparation was assayed against the International Reference Preparation for Plasmin (IRP-plasmin) using caseinolytic, fibrinolytic, fibrinogenolytic and chromogenic assay methods. The relative potency (using multi-dose bioassays) was estimated by the fibrinolytic method to be about twice that obtained by the caseinolytic, fibrinolytic and chromogenic assay methods. It was found that the UK-plasmin binds to fibrin to a greater extent than does the IRP-plasmin and this is advanced as an explanation for the discrepancy between assay methods. This difference in the binding of the two plasmins to fibrin may mean that it will be difficult to compare the fibrinolytic activities of various plasmin preparations. It is also shown that, during thermal degradation, the IRP-plasmin loses fibrinolytic activity more rapidly than amidolytic activity.

Key concepts: Plasmin, Chromogenic, Urokinase, Fibrin, Chemistry, Fibrinolysis, Potency, Biochemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Plasmin Potency Estimates: Influence of the Substrate Used in Assay — Research Paper | ScholarLens