1996PubMedRequires access

[Significance of renal biopsy in patients with isolated microhematuria].

R Hrvacević, P Spasić, J Dimitrijević, M Marić

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Retrospective study included 30 patients with isolated microhematuria in which renal biopsy was performed. Renal biopsy provided diagnosis in 28 (98.3%) cases, and histological finding was normal in only 2 (6.7%) patients. The most frequent finding was IgA nephritis found in 15 (50%) patients, while the other forms of glomerulonephritis were less frequent. In our patients there were no indications for steroid therapy. It was concluded that renal biopsy had great diagnostic value and that it should be preferred to invasive urologic-radiologic diagnostic procedures particularly when it is to be performed transcutaneously.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Retrospective study included 30 patients with isolated microhematuria in which renal biopsy was performed. Renal biopsy provided diagnosis in 28 (98.3%) cases, and histological finding was normal in only 2 (6.7%) patients. The most frequent finding was IgA nephritis found in 15 (50%) patients, while the other forms of glomerulonephritis were less frequent. In our patients there were no indications for steroid therapy. It was concluded that renal biopsy had great diagnostic value and that it should be preferred to invasive urologic-radiologic diagnostic procedures particularly when it is to be performed transcutaneously.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Retrospective study included 30 patients with isolated microhematuria in which renal biopsy was performed. Renal biopsy provided diagnosis in 28 (98.3%) cases, and histological finding was normal in only 2 (6.7%) patients. The most frequent finding was IgA nephritis found in 15 (50%) patients, while the other forms of glomerulonephritis were less frequent. In our patients there were no indications for steroid therapy. It was concluded that renal biopsy had great diagnostic value and that it should be preferred to invasive urologic-radiologic diagnostic procedures particularly when it is to be performed transcutaneously.

Key concepts: Microhematuria, Medicine, Renal biopsy, Biopsy, Nephritis, Retrospective cohort study, Urology, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Significance of renal biopsy in patients with isolated microhematuria]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens