1996•PubMedRequires access

Improved detection of p53 point mutations by dideoxyfingerprinting (ddF).

Danko Martincic, James A. Whitlock

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Two screening techniques for identifying point mutations (single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) and dideoxyfingerprinting (ddF)) were compared to sequencing to determine their efficiency in detecting mutations in exons 5-8 of the p53 tumor suppressor gene. Twelve human glioblastoma cell lines were studied by each of the three methods. Ten mutations were identified by sequencing; of these, 10/10 were detected by ddF, while SSCP detected 6/10 true mutations and falsely identified two presumed mutations not confirmed by sequencing. We examined the impact of parameters which influence DNA conformation (gel temperature, gel composition, and PCR product size) on the ability of SSCP and ddF to detect mutations. The sensitivity of SSCP varied with both gel temperature and the size of the PCR product; in contrast, ddF was not influenced by either gel temperature or product length (up to 460 nucleotides). We conclude that the increased sensitivity of ddF, together with its greater ease of application due to the lack of need for optimization, provides significant advantages over SSCP in screening DNA sequences for the presence of point mutations. Our results also suggest that the incidence of p53 mutations may be underestimated in studies of human cancers which utilize SSCP as the method of mutational screening.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two screening techniques for identifying point mutations (single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) and dideoxyfingerprinting (ddF)) were compared to sequencing to determine their efficiency in detecting mutations in exons 5-8 of the p53 tumor suppressor gene. Twelve human glioblastoma cell lines were studied by each of the three methods. Ten mutations were identified by sequencing; of these, 10/10 were detected by ddF, while SSCP detected 6/10 true mutations and falsely identified two presumed mutations not confirmed by sequencing. We examined the impact of parameters which influence DNA conformation (gel temperature, gel composition, and PCR product size) on the ability of SSCP and ddF to detect mutations. The sensitivity of SSCP varied with both gel temperature and the size of the PCR product; in contrast, ddF was not influenced by either gel temperature or product length (up to 460 nucleotides). We conclude that the increased sensitivity of ddF, together with its greater ease of application due to the lack of need for optimization, provides significant advantages over SSCP in screening DNA sequences for the presence of point mutations. Our results also suggest that the incidence of p53 mutations may be underestimated in studies of human cancers which utilize SSCP as the method of mutational screening.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two screening techniques for identifying point mutations (single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) and dideoxyfingerprinting (ddF)) were compared to sequencing to determine their efficiency in detecting mutations in exons 5-8 of the p53 tumor suppressor gene. Twelve human glioblastoma cell lines were studied by each of the three methods. Ten mutations were identified by sequencing; of these, 10/10 were detected by ddF, while SSCP detected 6/10 true mutations and falsely identified two presumed mutations not confirmed by sequencing. We examined the impact of parameters which influence DNA conformation (gel temperature, gel composition, and PCR product size) on the ability of SSCP and ddF to detect mutations. The sensitivity of SSCP varied with both gel temperature and the size of the PCR product; in contrast, ddF was not influenced by either gel temperature or product length (up to 460 nucleotides). We conclude that the increased sensitivity of ddF, together with its greater ease of application due to the lack of need for optimization, provides significant advantages over SSCP in screening DNA sequences for the presence of point mutations. Our results also suggest that the incidence of p53 mutations may be underestimated in studies of human cancers which utilize SSCP as the method of mutational screening.

Key concepts: Single-strand conformation polymorphism, Point mutation, Biology, Exon, Molecular biology, Genetics, DNA sequencing, Gene

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Improved detection of p53 point mutations by dideoxyfingerprinting (ddF). — Research Paper | ScholarLens