2016American Journal of Clinical PathologyOpen access

Automated Nucleated RBC Measurement Using the Sysmex XE-5000 Hematology Analyzer

David H. Hwang, David M. Dorfman, Dick G. Hwang, Patricia Senna, Olga Pozdnyakova

Open full text 20 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We validated the automatic nucleated RBC (nRBC) count on a Sysmex XE-5000 hematology analyzer (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan) and then evaluated the frequency of nRBCs in our patient population. METHODS: We correlated automated nRBC enumeration by the Sysmex XE-5000 hematology analyzer on 463 peripheral blood (PB) samples with the manual nRBC count. Results from 360,504 consecutive blood samples were reviewed to determine the frequency of nRBCs in various patient populations in our hospital. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the automated and manual nRBC count (Pearson's r = 0.97). Frequency of nRBCs varied in different patient populations and was significantly higher in the presence of other morphology flags or abnormal CBC parameters. Low-level nRBCs (0.2%-1.3%) were detected in 0.5% of samples with otherwise normal parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The automated method offers many advantages for high-throughput laboratories, including faster turnaround time, labor savings, and high reliability. Automated nRBC measurement allowed us to recognize a group of individuals who have low-level circulating nRBCs with otherwise normal CBC parameters. Nucleated RBC levels below 1.5% as detected by the automated count may be present in patients without increased erythropoiesis or a pathologic bone marrow process.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: We validated the automatic nucleated RBC (nRBC) count on a Sysmex XE-5000 hematology analyzer (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan) and then evaluated the frequency of nRBCs in our patient population. METHODS: We correlated automated nRBC enumeration by the Sysmex XE-5000 hematology analyzer on 463 peripheral blood (PB) samples with the manual nRBC count. Results from 360,504 consecutive blood samples were reviewed to determine the frequency of nRBCs in various patient populations in our hospital. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the automated and manual nRBC count (Pearson's r = 0.97). Frequency of nRBCs varied in different patient populations and was significantly higher in the presence of other morphology flags or abnormal CBC parameters. Low-level nRBCs (0.2%-1.3%) were detected in 0.5% of samples with otherwise normal parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The automated method offers many advantages for high-throughput laboratories, including faster turnaround time, labor savings, and high reliability. Automated nRBC measurement allowed us to recognize a group of individuals who have low-level circulating nRBCs with otherwise normal CBC parameters. Nucleated RBC levels below 1.5% as detected by the automated count may be present in patients without increased erythropoiesis or a pathologic bone marrow process.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: We validated the automatic nucleated RBC (nRBC) count on a Sysmex XE-5000 hematology analyzer (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan) and then evaluated the frequency of nRBCs in our patient population. METHODS: We correlated automated nRBC enumeration by the Sysmex XE-5000 hematology analyzer on 463 peripheral blood (PB) samples with the manual nRBC count. Results from 360,504 consecutive blood samples were reviewed to determine the frequency of nRBCs in various patient populations in our hospital. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the automated and manual nRBC count (Pearson's r = 0.97). Frequency of nRBCs varied in different patient populations and was significantly higher in the presence of other morphology flags or abnormal CBC parameters. Low-level nRBCs (0.2%-1.3%) were detected in 0.5% of samples with otherwise normal parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The automated method offers many advantages for high-throughput laboratories, including faster turnaround time, labor savings, and high reliability. Automated nRBC measurement allowed us to recognize a group of individuals who have low-level circulating nRBCs with otherwise normal CBC parameters. Nucleated RBC levels below 1.5% as detected by the automated count may be present in patients without increased erythropoiesis or a pathologic bone marrow process.

Key concepts: Hematology analyzer, Hematology, Medicine, Nuclear medicine, Medical physics, Pathology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Automated Nucleated RBC Measurement Using the Sysmex XE-5000 Hematology Analyzer — Research Paper | ScholarLens