1996PubMedRequires access

Comparative evaluation of the clinical efficacy and safety of ondansetron and metoclopramide in the prophylaxis of emesis induced by cancer chemotherapy regimens including cisplatin.

Suresh H. Advani, R. Gopal, Anjan Dhar, Hira Lal, N D Cooverji

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of ondansetron was evaluated and compared with metoclopramide in 93 patients receiving cisplatin containing cancer chemotherapy in a randomized, parallel group study. 8 mg Ondansetron i.v. was administered prior to chemotherapy followed by two further doses of 8 mg i.v. over the first 24 hours. Ondansetron 8 mg b.d. was then administered orally for the next 5 days. The metoclopramide dosage was 20 mg i.v. prior to chemotherapy followed by 2 i.v. doses of 10 mg each, 4 hours apart. For the next 5 days, an oral dose of 20 mg metoclopramide was administered. The anti-emetic efficacy of ondansetron as a prophylactic treatment was found to be significantly more effective than metoclopramide both during the acute and delayed phase of nausea and vomiting. Both treatments were well tolerated with no reported side-effects.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The efficacy and safety of ondansetron was evaluated and compared with metoclopramide in 93 patients receiving cisplatin containing cancer chemotherapy in a randomized, parallel group study. 8 mg Ondansetron i.v. was administered prior to chemotherapy followed by two further doses of 8 mg i.v. over the first 24 hours. Ondansetron 8 mg b.d. was then administered orally for the next 5 days. The metoclopramide dosage was 20 mg i.v. prior to chemotherapy followed by 2 i.v. doses of 10 mg each, 4 hours apart. For the next 5 days, an oral dose of 20 mg metoclopramide was administered. The anti-emetic efficacy of ondansetron as a prophylactic treatment was found to be significantly more effective than metoclopramide both during the acute and delayed phase of nausea and vomiting. Both treatments were well tolerated with no reported side-effects.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The efficacy and safety of ondansetron was evaluated and compared with metoclopramide in 93 patients receiving cisplatin containing cancer chemotherapy in a randomized, parallel group study. 8 mg Ondansetron i.v. was administered prior to chemotherapy followed by two further doses of 8 mg i.v. over the first 24 hours. Ondansetron 8 mg b.d. was then administered orally for the next 5 days. The metoclopramide dosage was 20 mg i.v. prior to chemotherapy followed by 2 i.v. doses of 10 mg each, 4 hours apart. For the next 5 days, an oral dose of 20 mg metoclopramide was administered. The anti-emetic efficacy of ondansetron as a prophylactic treatment was found to be significantly more effective than metoclopramide both during the acute and delayed phase of nausea and vomiting. Both treatments were well tolerated with no reported side-effects.

Key concepts: Metoclopramide, Ondansetron, Medicine, Nausea, Vomiting, Chemotherapy, Antiemetic, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative evaluation of the clinical efficacy and safety of ondansetron and metoclopramide in the prophylaxis of emesis induced by cancer chemotherapy regimens including cisplatin. — Research Paper | ScholarLens