1994PubMedRequires access

[Treatment of ascites in liver cirrhosis].

Mathias Holsey Gramkow, E. D. Christensen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The treatment of severe cirrhotic ascites is still a major clinical problem. On the basis of the current recommendations for treatment in the textbooks we have reviewed the randomized clinical trials comparing the existing different options of treatment. It is concluded that paracentesis is marked by several advantages compared to diuretics. Paracentesis has to be followed by an intravenous infusion of a volume expander to avert hypovolaemic complications and can then be performed as total paracentesis. The effect has to be maintained by diuretics. Synthetic products of low cost may substitute albumin. Intravenous reinfusion of ascites fluid constitutes a viable alternative. Under diuretic treatment spironolactone (in doses up to 400 mg daily) should be preferred to furosemide. Combinations of diuretics offer no advantages. The value of sodium restriction although rational is not documented in randomized trials. Sodium restriction is difficult to comply with and is not crucial for the therapeutic effect when diuretics are being administered at the same time. The advantages of a peritoneovenous shunt are outweighed by the very frequent incidence of shunt occlusion, for which reason the application should be restricted.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The treatment of severe cirrhotic ascites is still a major clinical problem. On the basis of the current recommendations for treatment in the textbooks we have reviewed the randomized clinical trials comparing the existing different options of treatment. It is concluded that paracentesis is marked by several advantages compared to diuretics. Paracentesis has to be followed by an intravenous infusion of a volume expander to avert hypovolaemic complications and can then be performed as total paracentesis. The effect has to be maintained by diuretics. Synthetic products of low cost may substitute albumin. Intravenous reinfusion of ascites fluid constitutes a viable alternative. Under diuretic treatment spironolactone (in doses up to 400 mg daily) should be preferred to furosemide. Combinations of diuretics offer no advantages. The value of sodium restriction although rational is not documented in randomized trials. Sodium restriction is difficult to comply with and is not crucial for the therapeutic effect when diuretics are being administered at the same time. The advantages of a peritoneovenous shunt are outweighed by the very frequent incidence of shunt occlusion, for which reason the application should be restricted.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The treatment of severe cirrhotic ascites is still a major clinical problem. On the basis of the current recommendations for treatment in the textbooks we have reviewed the randomized clinical trials comparing the existing different options of treatment. It is concluded that paracentesis is marked by several advantages compared to diuretics. Paracentesis has to be followed by an intravenous infusion of a volume expander to avert hypovolaemic complications and can then be performed as total paracentesis. The effect has to be maintained by diuretics. Synthetic products of low cost may substitute albumin. Intravenous reinfusion of ascites fluid constitutes a viable alternative. Under diuretic treatment spironolactone (in doses up to 400 mg daily) should be preferred to furosemide. Combinations of diuretics offer no advantages. The value of sodium restriction although rational is not documented in randomized trials. Sodium restriction is difficult to comply with and is not crucial for the therapeutic effect when diuretics are being administered at the same time. The advantages of a peritoneovenous shunt are outweighed by the very frequent incidence of shunt occlusion, for which reason the application should be restricted.

Key concepts: Ascites, Medicine, Paracentesis, Peritoneovenous shunt, Diuretic, Furosemide, Spironolactone, Cirrhosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Treatment of ascites in liver cirrhosis]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens