Comparative study of gastric emptying and nutritional status after pylorus-preserving vs. subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a specific, worrisome complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD), whereas subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (SSPPD) that excises the pylorus ring seems to be effective in reducing DGE. This study compared gastric emptying and nutritional status between PPPD and SSPPD over 1 year. METHODOLOGY: From June 2003 to December 2007, 41 patients (PPPD: 33, SSPPD: 8) were enrolled in this study to evaluate differences in gastric emptying and nutritional status at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gastric emptying was evaluated by 13C-acetate breath test. Nutritional status (body weight, serum levels of total protein, albumin and total cholesterol) was similarly assessed. RESULTS: At 1 month, gastric emptying evaluated at T1/2 (half-emptying time) was significantly prolonged in the PPPD but not in the SSPPD compared to the preoperative level. Thereafter, T1/2 was decreased and showed function significantly better preserved at 3, 6 and 12 months after PPPD than after SSPPD. Body weight recovery was significantly better at 6 and 12 months after PPPD than after SSPPD. Other nutritional parameters were better preserved in the PPPD during 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: PPPD seems to be a more suitable surgical procedure than SSPPD in regard to gastric emptying and nutritional status.