[Assessment and self-assessment of patients' attitudes toward their psychotic disorders].
Andrzej Bembenek, Ewa Schaeffer, Jacek Wciórka
Abstract
Andrzej Bembenek, Ewa Schaeffer, Jacek Wciórka
Abstract
The aim of the study was the evaluation of concordance between rating and self-rating of attitudes toward psychotic disorders in one hundred patients (72 of them with diagnosis of schizophrenia). At discharge from the hospital patients were examined by two scales: Experience of Illness Scale (for rating) and My Experience of Illness Scale (for self-rating). Moderate concordance of results of rating and self-rating of the overall patients' attitude was noted. The higher concordance was found on dimension of evaluation of the illness experience, lower on dimension of reflectiveness to disease experience, and the lowest one on dimension of identification of the disease with self. Two different scales, simultaneously used, seem very beneficial because they reflected attitudes from two different perspectives, creating more complete a picture.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The aim of the study was the evaluation of concordance between rating and self-rating of attitudes toward psychotic disorders in one hundred patients (72 of them with diagnosis of schizophrenia). At discharge from the hospital patients were examined by two scales: Experience of Illness Scale (for rating) and My Experience of Illness Scale (for self-rating). Moderate concordance of results of rating and self-rating of the overall patients' attitude was noted. The higher concordance was found on dimension of evaluation of the illness experience, lower on dimension of reflectiveness to disease experience, and the lowest one on dimension of identification of the disease with self. Two different scales, simultaneously used, seem very beneficial because they reflected attitudes from two different perspectives, creating more complete a picture.
Key concepts: Concordance, Rating scale, Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming), Scale (ratio), Clinical psychology, Psychology, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Dimension (graph theory)