2008•PubMedRequires access

[The comparative study of patients with severe polytrauma treated by damage control orthopedits in normal time and in earthquake].

Yan Xiong, Quanyin Du, Sun Hong-zhen, Zi-ming Wang, Siyu Wu, Aimin Wang

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of damage control in patients with severe polytrauma in normal time and in the earthquake of 2008 Sichuan China. METHODS: In the retrospective study, 26 cases with severity polytrauma in peacetime and 24 cases with severe polytrauma who have mainly sustained in the earthquake of 2008 Sichuan China were involovd. The patients' demographics, the methods and effects of damage control were evaluated. RESULTS: In the earthquake group, 24 cases succeeded in the rescuing life; among whom, 3 patients needed the further debridement and dermoplasty. In the normal time group, 26 cases succeeded in the rescuing life; among whom, 19 patients had returned to their former work and 3 patients needed the further treatment. There was no difference between two groups in therapeutic effects (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both in earthquake and in normal time, treating the severity polytrauma by damage control orthopedics can acquire satisfied effect.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of damage control in patients with severe polytrauma in normal time and in the earthquake of 2008 Sichuan China. METHODS: In the retrospective study, 26 cases with severity polytrauma in peacetime and 24 cases with severe polytrauma who have mainly sustained in the earthquake of 2008 Sichuan China were involovd. The patients' demographics, the methods and effects of damage control were evaluated. RESULTS: In the earthquake group, 24 cases succeeded in the rescuing life; among whom, 3 patients needed the further debridement and dermoplasty. In the normal time group, 26 cases succeeded in the rescuing life; among whom, 19 patients had returned to their former work and 3 patients needed the further treatment. There was no difference between two groups in therapeutic effects (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both in earthquake and in normal time, treating the severity polytrauma by damage control orthopedics can acquire satisfied effect.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of damage control in patients with severe polytrauma in normal time and in the earthquake of 2008 Sichuan China. METHODS: In the retrospective study, 26 cases with severity polytrauma in peacetime and 24 cases with severe polytrauma who have mainly sustained in the earthquake of 2008 Sichuan China were involovd. The patients' demographics, the methods and effects of damage control were evaluated. RESULTS: In the earthquake group, 24 cases succeeded in the rescuing life; among whom, 3 patients needed the further debridement and dermoplasty. In the normal time group, 26 cases succeeded in the rescuing life; among whom, 19 patients had returned to their former work and 3 patients needed the further treatment. There was no difference between two groups in therapeutic effects (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both in earthquake and in normal time, treating the severity polytrauma by damage control orthopedics can acquire satisfied effect.

Key concepts: Polytrauma, Medicine, Damage control, Orthopedic surgery, Retrospective cohort study, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[The comparative study of patients with severe polytrauma treated by damage control orthopedits in normal time and in earthquake]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens