The case for pancreas transplantation.
David E.R. Sutherland
Abstract
David E.R. Sutherland
Abstract
More than 6,000 pancreas transplants had been performed by the end of 1994. Insulin-independence currently persists for more than one year in over 75% of diabetic recipients of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants, and in approximately 50% of recipients of a pancreas transplant alone. As kidney recipients are obligated to undergo immunosuppression in conjunction with this operation, the addition of a pancreas transplant entails only extra surgery. For non-uremic recipients of a pancreas transplant alone, immunosuppression itself is the trade-off for correction of diabetes. The problems of diabetes must be of a magnitude to justify the use of anti-rejection drugs. Thus, the main pancreas transplant applications have been in patients who are extremely labile or experience hypoglycaemic unawareness syndrome. Application to non-uremic patients without current problems would require randomisation to determine whether the probability of freedom from problems or the occurrence of complications differs over years of follow-up between a non-diabetic condition on immunosuppression and a diabetic status off immunosuppression. In the meantime, pancreas transplantation should be applied routinely to diabetic recipients of a kidney transplant or those whose quality of life is poor because of lability.
OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
More than 6,000 pancreas transplants had been performed by the end of 1994. Insulin-independence currently persists for more than one year in over 75% of diabetic recipients of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants, and in approximately 50% of recipients of a pancreas transplant alone. As kidney recipients are obligated to undergo immunosuppression in conjunction with this operation, the addition of a pancreas transplant entails only extra surgery. For non-uremic recipients of a pancreas transplant alone, immunosuppression itself is the trade-off for correction of diabetes. The problems of diabetes must be of a magnitude to justify the use of anti-rejection drugs. Thus, the main pancreas transplant applications have been in patients who are extremely labile or experience hypoglycaemic unawareness syndrome. Application to non-uremic patients without current problems would require randomisation to determine whether the probability of freedom from problems or the occurrence of complications differs over years of follow-up between a non-diabetic condition on immunosuppression and a diabetic status off immunosuppression. In the meantime, pancreas transplantation should be applied routinely to diabetic recipients of a kidney transplant or those whose quality of life is poor because of lability.
Key concepts: Immunosuppression, Medicine, Pancreas transplantation, Diabetes mellitus, Pancreas, Transplantation, Kidney, Kidney transplantation