2003PubMedRequires access

Feasibility of microsurgical reconstruction of the male reproductive tract after percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA).

Peter Chan, Jamie Libman

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

For obstructive azoospermia, surgical sperm retrieval from the epididymis for IVF/ICSI is an established management. However, various recent studies have established that surgical reconstruction with vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy remains a more cost-effective treatment option than upfront assisted reproduction. After epididymal sperm retrieval, fibrosis and scarring of the punctured epididymal tubule can lead to complete epididymal obstruction. The feasibility of surgical reconstruction after surgical epididymal sperm retrieval has not been established. We describe two cases of bilateral microsurgical vasoepididymostomy, using a new 2-suture longitudinal intussusception technique we previously described, after previous successful bilateral percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA). In both cases, motile sperm were found in ejaculate in the first post-operative semen analysis at 6 weeks and 2 months. We conclude that even in men with previous epididymal sperm retrieval, surgical reconstruction remains a feasible management option for fertility.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For obstructive azoospermia, surgical sperm retrieval from the epididymis for IVF/ICSI is an established management. However, various recent studies have established that surgical reconstruction with vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy remains a more cost-effective treatment option than upfront assisted reproduction. After epididymal sperm retrieval, fibrosis and scarring of the punctured epididymal tubule can lead to complete epididymal obstruction. The feasibility of surgical reconstruction after surgical epididymal sperm retrieval has not been established. We describe two cases of bilateral microsurgical vasoepididymostomy, using a new 2-suture longitudinal intussusception technique we previously described, after previous successful bilateral percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA). In both cases, motile sperm were found in ejaculate in the first post-operative semen analysis at 6 weeks and 2 months. We conclude that even in men with previous epididymal sperm retrieval, surgical reconstruction remains a feasible management option for fertility.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For obstructive azoospermia, surgical sperm retrieval from the epididymis for IVF/ICSI is an established management. However, various recent studies have established that surgical reconstruction with vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy remains a more cost-effective treatment option than upfront assisted reproduction. After epididymal sperm retrieval, fibrosis and scarring of the punctured epididymal tubule can lead to complete epididymal obstruction. The feasibility of surgical reconstruction after surgical epididymal sperm retrieval has not been established. We describe two cases of bilateral microsurgical vasoepididymostomy, using a new 2-suture longitudinal intussusception technique we previously described, after previous successful bilateral percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA). In both cases, motile sperm were found in ejaculate in the first post-operative semen analysis at 6 weeks and 2 months. We conclude that even in men with previous epididymal sperm retrieval, surgical reconstruction remains a feasible management option for fertility.

Key concepts: Vasovasostomy, Sperm Retrieval, Medicine, Obstructive azoospermia, Epididymis, Sperm, Testicular sperm extraction, Vasectomy reversal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Feasibility of microsurgical reconstruction of the male reproductive tract after percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA). — Research Paper | ScholarLens