Clinical pharmacology of angiotensin and bradykinin in human forearm vasculature.
James M. Ritter, John R. Cockcroft, David Sciberras, Michael R. Goldberg
Abstract
James M. Ritter, John R. Cockcroft, David Sciberras, Michael R. Goldberg
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS: Losartan inhibits the renin-angiotensin system by blockade of angiotensin II receptors, whereas enalapril blocks the renin-angiotensin system by inhibiting the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II by the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE). Since ACE inactivates bradykinin in addition to its action on angiotensin I we hypothesized that losartan and enalapril have different effects on the response to angiotensin and bradykinin. METHODS: We studied healthy volunteers dosed with placebo, enalapril and losartan 4-6 h before measurement of forearm blood flow by venous occlusion plethysmography. Saline, angiotensin I, angiotensin II and bradykinin were infused into the left brachial artery. RESULTS: Losartan produced a similar inhibition of the vasoconstriction induced by angiotensin I and angiotensin II without significantly influencing the bradykinin-induced vasodilation, whereas enalapril potentiated the vasodilator effect of bradykinin and selectively inhibited the vasoconstriction induced by angiotensin I without altering the response to angiotensin II. CONCLUSION: These pharmacological differences suggest that angiotensin II receptor antagonists and ACE inhibitors may not be therapeutically equivalent.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
HYPOTHESIS: Losartan inhibits the renin-angiotensin system by blockade of angiotensin II receptors, whereas enalapril blocks the renin-angiotensin system by inhibiting the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II by the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE). Since ACE inactivates bradykinin in addition to its action on angiotensin I we hypothesized that losartan and enalapril have different effects on the response to angiotensin and bradykinin. METHODS: We studied healthy volunteers dosed with placebo, enalapril and losartan 4-6 h before measurement of forearm blood flow by venous occlusion plethysmography. Saline, angiotensin I, angiotensin II and bradykinin were infused into the left brachial artery. RESULTS: Losartan produced a similar inhibition of the vasoconstriction induced by angiotensin I and angiotensin II without significantly influencing the bradykinin-induced vasodilation, whereas enalapril potentiated the vasodilator effect of bradykinin and selectively inhibited the vasoconstriction induced by angiotensin I without altering the response to angiotensin II. CONCLUSION: These pharmacological differences suggest that angiotensin II receptor antagonists and ACE inhibitors may not be therapeutically equivalent.
Key concepts: Losartan, Bradykinin, Enalapril, Angiotensin II, Angiotensin-converting enzyme, Medicine, Angiotensin II receptor type 1, Renin–angiotensin system