2000Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical PharmacologyRequires access

Pharmacokinetic study of theophylline in dogs after intravenous administration with and without ethylenediamine

Hikaru Kawai, Shoichi Kokubun, T. Matsumoto, Jun Kojima, K Onodera

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Aminophylline (ethylenediamine salt of theophylline) and Theodrip, a new formulation of theophylline developed by Nikken Chemicals, are drugs for the treatment of acute bronchial asthma in injectable form. The present study was conducted using dogs to first confirm the bioequivalence of the two injectable forms containing theophylline and aminophylline and to secondly clarify the influence of the rate of venous infusion on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline in plasma. The following results were obtained: 1) Pharmacokinetic parameters of plasma theophylline after an intravenous bolus injection were close to those after the dosing of aminophylline in dogs by a crossover method. Thus, the 95% confidence limits of mean value differences of Cmax, t1/2 and AUC between the two injection forms were in the range of -3.16-4.28%, -6.19-7.28% and -7.23-5.28%, respectively. These results indicate the bioequivalence between theophylline and aminophylline in dogs from a pharmacokinetic point of view as well as the lack of influence of ethylenediamine on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline. 2) After the intravenous bolus injection (30 sec) and the 15-min constant rate infusion of theophylline to dogs, the plasma concentrations of theophylline were 27.37 +/- 3.67 micrograms/ml and 18.34 +/- 2.32 micrograms/ml immediately after the completion of administration, respectively. It is notable that in humans the former concentration level has been observed to frequently cause adverse effects, whereas the latter was in the safe range. Consequently, the 15-min constant rate infusion did not result in the rapid increase in the plasma theophylline concentrations and was superior to the bolus injection from the viewpoint of maintaining the safety plasma concentrations. In conclusion, to avoid hypersensitivity due to ethylenediamine and the adverse effects caused by high plasma concentrations of theophylline, it was considered that constant rate infusion of theophylline to the venous is preferable in the clinical setting.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aminophylline (ethylenediamine salt of theophylline) and Theodrip, a new formulation of theophylline developed by Nikken Chemicals, are drugs for the treatment of acute bronchial asthma in injectable form. The present study was conducted using dogs to first confirm the bioequivalence of the two injectable forms containing theophylline and aminophylline and to secondly clarify the influence of the rate of venous infusion on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline in plasma. The following results were obtained: 1) Pharmacokinetic parameters of plasma theophylline after an intravenous bolus injection were close to those after the dosing of aminophylline in dogs by a crossover method. Thus, the 95% confidence limits of mean value differences of Cmax, t1/2 and AUC between the two injection forms were in the range of -3.16-4.28%, -6.19-7.28% and -7.23-5.28%, respectively. These results indicate the bioequivalence between theophylline and aminophylline in dogs from a pharmacokinetic point of view as well as the lack of influence of ethylenediamine on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline. 2) After the intravenous bolus injection (30 sec) and the 15-min constant rate infusion of theophylline to dogs, the plasma concentrations of theophylline were 27.37 +/- 3.67 micrograms/ml and 18.34 +/- 2.32 micrograms/ml immediately after the completion of administration, respectively. It is notable that in humans the former concentration level has been observed to frequently cause adverse effects, whereas the latter was in the safe range. Consequently, the 15-min constant rate infusion did not result in the rapid increase in the plasma theophylline concentrations and was superior to the bolus injection from the viewpoint of maintaining the safety plasma concentrations. In conclusion, to avoid hypersensitivity due to ethylenediamine and the adverse effects caused by high plasma concentrations of theophylline, it was considered that constant rate infusion of theophylline to the venous is preferable in the clinical setting.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aminophylline (ethylenediamine salt of theophylline) and Theodrip, a new formulation of theophylline developed by Nikken Chemicals, are drugs for the treatment of acute bronchial asthma in injectable form. The present study was conducted using dogs to first confirm the bioequivalence of the two injectable forms containing theophylline and aminophylline and to secondly clarify the influence of the rate of venous infusion on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline in plasma. The following results were obtained: 1) Pharmacokinetic parameters of plasma theophylline after an intravenous bolus injection were close to those after the dosing of aminophylline in dogs by a crossover method. Thus, the 95% confidence limits of mean value differences of Cmax, t1/2 and AUC between the two injection forms were in the range of -3.16-4.28%, -6.19-7.28% and -7.23-5.28%, respectively. These results indicate the bioequivalence between theophylline and aminophylline in dogs from a pharmacokinetic point of view as well as the lack of influence of ethylenediamine on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline. 2) After the intravenous bolus injection (30 sec) and the 15-min constant rate infusion of theophylline to dogs, the plasma concentrations of theophylline were 27.37 +/- 3.67 micrograms/ml and 18.34 +/- 2.32 micrograms/ml immediately after the completion of administration, respectively. It is notable that in humans the former concentration level has been observed to frequently cause adverse effects, whereas the latter was in the safe range. Consequently, the 15-min constant rate infusion did not result in the rapid increase in the plasma theophylline concentrations and was superior to the bolus injection from the viewpoint of maintaining the safety plasma concentrations. In conclusion, to avoid hypersensitivity due to ethylenediamine and the adverse effects caused by high plasma concentrations of theophylline, it was considered that constant rate infusion of theophylline to the venous is preferable in the clinical setting.

Key concepts: Theophylline, Aminophylline, Pharmacokinetics, Bronchodilator, Bioequivalence, Medicine, Bolus (digestion), Cmax

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pharmacokinetic study of theophylline in dogs after intravenous administration with and without ethylenediamine — Research Paper | ScholarLens