2002PubMedRequires access

[The utility of vascularized free fibula flap in mandibular reconstruction: a clinical report of 25 cases].

Meng Tong, Longjiang Li, Yu-ming Wen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of vascularized free fibula flap as a new method for mandibular reconstruction. METHODS: 25 cases (17 male to 8 female) who have received mandibular reconstruction with free vascularized fibular flaps in our hospital were studied retrospectively. The average length of the fibula grafts is 10.0 cm (range from 5.5 to 16 cm). 3 cases received primary insertion of osteointegrated dental implants into the free fibula flap, and all these 5 implants survived. RESULTS: All flaps except 1 were viable. 62% of the cases took normal diet postoperatively, and the remainder took soft diet as well. All patients spoke clearly. No ankle unstability was reported. And the aesthetic assessments in all patients were good or fair. CONCLUSION: Vascularized free fibular flap takes its distinct advantages to other autogeneous free bone flaps and is confirmed to be one of the optimal methods for mandible reconstruction by our study.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of vascularized free fibula flap as a new method for mandibular reconstruction. METHODS: 25 cases (17 male to 8 female) who have received mandibular reconstruction with free vascularized fibular flaps in our hospital were studied retrospectively. The average length of the fibula grafts is 10.0 cm (range from 5.5 to 16 cm). 3 cases received primary insertion of osteointegrated dental implants into the free fibula flap, and all these 5 implants survived. RESULTS: All flaps except 1 were viable. 62% of the cases took normal diet postoperatively, and the remainder took soft diet as well. All patients spoke clearly. No ankle unstability was reported. And the aesthetic assessments in all patients were good or fair. CONCLUSION: Vascularized free fibular flap takes its distinct advantages to other autogeneous free bone flaps and is confirmed to be one of the optimal methods for mandible reconstruction by our study.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of vascularized free fibula flap as a new method for mandibular reconstruction. METHODS: 25 cases (17 male to 8 female) who have received mandibular reconstruction with free vascularized fibular flaps in our hospital were studied retrospectively. The average length of the fibula grafts is 10.0 cm (range from 5.5 to 16 cm). 3 cases received primary insertion of osteointegrated dental implants into the free fibula flap, and all these 5 implants survived. RESULTS: All flaps except 1 were viable. 62% of the cases took normal diet postoperatively, and the remainder took soft diet as well. All patients spoke clearly. No ankle unstability was reported. And the aesthetic assessments in all patients were good or fair. CONCLUSION: Vascularized free fibular flap takes its distinct advantages to other autogeneous free bone flaps and is confirmed to be one of the optimal methods for mandible reconstruction by our study.

Key concepts: Fibula, Medicine, Free flap, Ankle, Surgery, Mandible (arthropod mouthpart), Soft tissue, Dentistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[The utility of vascularized free fibula flap in mandibular reconstruction: a clinical report of 25 cases]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens