1993PubMedRequires access

Prevalence of postoperative sensitivity with indirect Class II resin composite inlays.

Kreulen Cm, van Amerongen We, Gruythuysen Rj, Borgmeijer Pj, Akerboom Hb

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

In this clinical trial, the prevalence of postoperative sensitivity is studied in a comparison of standard size indirect class II resin composite inlays with class II amalgam restorations. Fifteen percent of the 240 restored teeth (resin composite and amalgam restorations) showed some form of sensitivity, the majority of them of a passing nature. No difference was found between amalgam and composite restorations. Molars appear to show more complaints than premolars and, rather than the restorative material applied, the patient seems to determine the results. Differences in prevalence of sensitivity between direct resin composite restorations in a previous study and the indirect restorations are discussed, using among others the differences in sensitivity that were found between the amalgam-control restorations of both studies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this clinical trial, the prevalence of postoperative sensitivity is studied in a comparison of standard size indirect class II resin composite inlays with class II amalgam restorations. Fifteen percent of the 240 restored teeth (resin composite and amalgam restorations) showed some form of sensitivity, the majority of them of a passing nature. No difference was found between amalgam and composite restorations. Molars appear to show more complaints than premolars and, rather than the restorative material applied, the patient seems to determine the results. Differences in prevalence of sensitivity between direct resin composite restorations in a previous study and the indirect restorations are discussed, using among others the differences in sensitivity that were found between the amalgam-control restorations of both studies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this clinical trial, the prevalence of postoperative sensitivity is studied in a comparison of standard size indirect class II resin composite inlays with class II amalgam restorations. Fifteen percent of the 240 restored teeth (resin composite and amalgam restorations) showed some form of sensitivity, the majority of them of a passing nature. No difference was found between amalgam and composite restorations. Molars appear to show more complaints than premolars and, rather than the restorative material applied, the patient seems to determine the results. Differences in prevalence of sensitivity between direct resin composite restorations in a previous study and the indirect restorations are discussed, using among others the differences in sensitivity that were found between the amalgam-control restorations of both studies.

Key concepts: Amalgam (chemistry), Inlay, Dentistry, Molar, Composite number, Medicine, Resin composite, Dental restoration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prevalence of postoperative sensitivity with indirect Class II resin composite inlays. — Research Paper | ScholarLens