1998PubMedRequires access

Confounding factors in observational and intervention studies.

Ricardo A. Feldman

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

In studying the association of Helicobacter pylori with any particular illness, it is essential to consider the effects of confounding. The methods of dealing with confounding, a situation in which there is a true association of a risk factor and a disease, and the association is not causal, include matching during the design and carrying out of the study, or stratification and adjustment during the analysis. Adjustment during analysis of data collected in observational studies can reduce the effects of confounding. However, multivariate models are seriously limited in their ability to control for confounding, especially when covariates are imprecisely measured.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In studying the association of Helicobacter pylori with any particular illness, it is essential to consider the effects of confounding. The methods of dealing with confounding, a situation in which there is a true association of a risk factor and a disease, and the association is not causal, include matching during the design and carrying out of the study, or stratification and adjustment during the analysis. Adjustment during analysis of data collected in observational studies can reduce the effects of confounding. However, multivariate models are seriously limited in their ability to control for confounding, especially when covariates are imprecisely measured.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In studying the association of Helicobacter pylori with any particular illness, it is essential to consider the effects of confounding. The methods of dealing with confounding, a situation in which there is a true association of a risk factor and a disease, and the association is not causal, include matching during the design and carrying out of the study, or stratification and adjustment during the analysis. Adjustment during analysis of data collected in observational studies can reduce the effects of confounding. However, multivariate models are seriously limited in their ability to control for confounding, especially when covariates are imprecisely measured.

Key concepts: Confounding, Observational study, Medicine, Propensity score matching, Covariate, Multivariate statistics, Matching (statistics), Environmental health

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Confounding factors in observational and intervention studies. — Research Paper | ScholarLens