2007PubMedRequires access

High dose ondansetron for reducing motion sickness in highly susceptible subjects.

Eric R. Muth, Amanda N. Elkins

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ondansetron is currently being explored as a treatment for motion sickness due to its proven prophylactic effect on post-operative nausea, the nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy, and its lack of side effects. This study sought to compare the effectiveness of placebo, dimenhydrinate, and ondansetron for preventing motion sickness in highly susceptible subjects. METHODS: A total of 63 subjects with a history of frequent motion sickness and positive report of self-treatment of motion sickness with over-the-counter medications were divided into 3 groups of 20 (3 were disqualified). Depending on their group assignment, subjects were given placebo, dimenhydrinate, or ondansetron 1 h before being rotated at 20 rpm while making head movements. Symptoms of motion sickness and electrogastrogram (EGG) data were collected prior to and during rotation. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in number of head movements tolerated, time rotating, or symptom questionnaire scores. All groups showed a marginally significant decrease in normal 3 cycle per minute activity [F (1.45) = 3.04, p = 0.088] and a significant increase in gastric tachyarrhythmia [F (1,45) = 9.71, p = 0.003], a pattern typically associated with motion sickness development. CONCLUSION: Neither ondansetron or dimenhydrinate prevented motion sickness in groups of highly susceptible people. Continued development of new treatments is necessary.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Ondansetron is currently being explored as a treatment for motion sickness due to its proven prophylactic effect on post-operative nausea, the nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy, and its lack of side effects. This study sought to compare the effectiveness of placebo, dimenhydrinate, and ondansetron for preventing motion sickness in highly susceptible subjects. METHODS: A total of 63 subjects with a history of frequent motion sickness and positive report of self-treatment of motion sickness with over-the-counter medications were divided into 3 groups of 20 (3 were disqualified). Depending on their group assignment, subjects were given placebo, dimenhydrinate, or ondansetron 1 h before being rotated at 20 rpm while making head movements. Symptoms of motion sickness and electrogastrogram (EGG) data were collected prior to and during rotation. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in number of head movements tolerated, time rotating, or symptom questionnaire scores. All groups showed a marginally significant decrease in normal 3 cycle per minute activity [F (1.45) = 3.04, p = 0.088] and a significant increase in gastric tachyarrhythmia [F (1,45) = 9.71, p = 0.003], a pattern typically associated with motion sickness development. CONCLUSION: Neither ondansetron or dimenhydrinate prevented motion sickness in groups of highly susceptible people. Continued development of new treatments is necessary.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Ondansetron is currently being explored as a treatment for motion sickness due to its proven prophylactic effect on post-operative nausea, the nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy, and its lack of side effects. This study sought to compare the effectiveness of placebo, dimenhydrinate, and ondansetron for preventing motion sickness in highly susceptible subjects. METHODS: A total of 63 subjects with a history of frequent motion sickness and positive report of self-treatment of motion sickness with over-the-counter medications were divided into 3 groups of 20 (3 were disqualified). Depending on their group assignment, subjects were given placebo, dimenhydrinate, or ondansetron 1 h before being rotated at 20 rpm while making head movements. Symptoms of motion sickness and electrogastrogram (EGG) data were collected prior to and during rotation. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in number of head movements tolerated, time rotating, or symptom questionnaire scores. All groups showed a marginally significant decrease in normal 3 cycle per minute activity [F (1.45) = 3.04, p = 0.088] and a significant increase in gastric tachyarrhythmia [F (1,45) = 9.71, p = 0.003], a pattern typically associated with motion sickness development. CONCLUSION: Neither ondansetron or dimenhydrinate prevented motion sickness in groups of highly susceptible people. Continued development of new treatments is necessary.

Key concepts: Motion sickness, Ondansetron, Nausea, Medicine, Vomiting, Placebo, Anesthesia, Electrogastrogram

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
High dose ondansetron for reducing motion sickness in highly susceptible subjects. — Research Paper | ScholarLens