ScholarLens Back to search
1988•PubMedRequires access

Clinical evaluation of hepatic artery embolization: comparison between Gelfoam and Lipiodol with anticancer agent.

Yoshiki Yamashita, Masashi Takahashi, Naoko Fujimura, Masayasu KAN

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

Transcatheter embolization of the hepatic artery for hepatomas was performed with the use of Gelfoam and Lipiodol-ADM in 98 patients (Gelfoam 63 patients; Lipiodol-ADM 35 patients). The cumulative one-year survival rate was 52.9% for the Gelfoam group and 28% for the Lipiodol-ADM group. Response to hepatic embolization was most remarkable in the nodular type; CR was obtained in five patients and PR in 31 patients (response rate: CR + PR = 57.1%) in the Gelfoam group, with no CR and six PRs (response rate, 17.6%) in the Lipiodol-ADM group. Alfa-feto protein (AFP) decrease of more than 50% was observed in 78.1% of the Gelfoam group and 40% of the Lipiodol-ADM group. The side effects were transient and controlled with conservative treatment. Gelfoam seemed to be more effective in the treatment of hepatoma, but the damage to normal tissue was more severe with this embolic material.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Transcatheter embolization of the hepatic artery for hepatomas was performed with the use of Gelfoam and Lipiodol-ADM in 98 patients (Gelfoam 63 patients; Lipiodol-ADM 35 patients). The cumulative one-year survival rate was 52.9% for the Gelfoam group and 28% for the Lipiodol-ADM group. Response to hepatic embolization was most remarkable in the nodular type; CR was obtained in five patients and PR in 31 patients (response rate: CR + PR = 57.1%) in the Gelfoam group, with no CR and six PRs (response rate, 17.6%) in the Lipiodol-ADM group. Alfa-feto protein (AFP) decrease of more than 50% was observed in 78.1% of the Gelfoam group and 40% of the Lipiodol-ADM group. The side effects were transient and controlled with conservative treatment. Gelfoam seemed to be more effective in the treatment of hepatoma, but the damage to normal tissue was more severe with this embolic material.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Transcatheter embolization of the hepatic artery for hepatomas was performed with the use of Gelfoam and Lipiodol-ADM in 98 patients (Gelfoam 63 patients; Lipiodol-ADM 35 patients). The cumulative one-year survival rate was 52.9% for the Gelfoam group and 28% for the Lipiodol-ADM group. Response to hepatic embolization was most remarkable in the nodular type; CR was obtained in five patients and PR in 31 patients (response rate: CR + PR = 57.1%) in the Gelfoam group, with no CR and six PRs (response rate, 17.6%) in the Lipiodol-ADM group. Alfa-feto protein (AFP) decrease of more than 50% was observed in 78.1% of the Gelfoam group and 40% of the Lipiodol-ADM group. The side effects were transient and controlled with conservative treatment. Gelfoam seemed to be more effective in the treatment of hepatoma, but the damage to normal tissue was more severe with this embolic material.

Key concepts: Lipiodol, Medicine, Embolization, Artery, Survival rate, Gastroenterology, Surgery, Radiology

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical evaluation of hepatic artery embolization: comparison between Gelfoam and Lipiodol with anticancer agent. — Research Paper | ScholarLens