1996PubMedRequires access

[Comparison of the use of a vaccine and sequential antibiotic treatment in a herd infected with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae].

Alexandra Grand, M. Kobisch

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae vaccination with pulse medication in a pig herd chronically infected with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Control groups of pigs were compared to vaccinated or treated groups. Medication and vaccination induced a significant reduction of pneumonia score (46.37% and 29.8% respectively, compared to 53.85% for control groups, p < 0.05). The treatment did not induce a significant reduction of the mean range of lung lesions (3.75) compared to the control groups (4.25). The mean range of lung lesions was significantly reduced by vaccine (3.06, p < 0.005) but not by treatment. Neither the medication nor the vaccination were able to clear M hyopneumoniae or Pasteurella multocida from lung tissue. In this herd, the vaccination had a beneficial effect on daily weight gain of pigs (695.9 g/day compared to 683.1 g/day for the control groups). The improvement of the age at slaughtering was 1.3 days for treated groups and 2.4 days for vaccinated groups compared to control groups. The vaccination induced a significant improvement in muscle rate (57.05%) compared to control groups (56.41%, p < 0.05) and to treated groups (56.21%, p < 0.001). In this herd infected with M hyopneumoniae, after allowing for treatment cost, manpower excepted, the increase in value was from -3 FF to -11 FF for the antibiotic treatment and +10.4 FF for the vaccination. From economical and medical points of view, the vaccination was preferable to the treatment under the conditions described in this study.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae vaccination with pulse medication in a pig herd chronically infected with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Control groups of pigs were compared to vaccinated or treated groups. Medication and vaccination induced a significant reduction of pneumonia score (46.37% and 29.8% respectively, compared to 53.85% for control groups, p < 0.05). The treatment did not induce a significant reduction of the mean range of lung lesions (3.75) compared to the control groups (4.25). The mean range of lung lesions was significantly reduced by vaccine (3.06, p < 0.005) but not by treatment. Neither the medication nor the vaccination were able to clear M hyopneumoniae or Pasteurella multocida from lung tissue. In this herd, the vaccination had a beneficial effect on daily weight gain of pigs (695.9 g/day compared to 683.1 g/day for the control groups). The improvement of the age at slaughtering was 1.3 days for treated groups and 2.4 days for vaccinated groups compared to control groups. The vaccination induced a significant improvement in muscle rate (57.05%) compared to control groups (56.41%, p < 0.05) and to treated groups (56.21%, p < 0.001). In this herd infected with M hyopneumoniae, after allowing for treatment cost, manpower excepted, the increase in value was from -3 FF to -11 FF for the antibiotic treatment and +10.4 FF for the vaccination. From economical and medical points of view, the vaccination was preferable to the treatment under the conditions described in this study.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae vaccination with pulse medication in a pig herd chronically infected with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Control groups of pigs were compared to vaccinated or treated groups. Medication and vaccination induced a significant reduction of pneumonia score (46.37% and 29.8% respectively, compared to 53.85% for control groups, p < 0.05). The treatment did not induce a significant reduction of the mean range of lung lesions (3.75) compared to the control groups (4.25). The mean range of lung lesions was significantly reduced by vaccine (3.06, p < 0.005) but not by treatment. Neither the medication nor the vaccination were able to clear M hyopneumoniae or Pasteurella multocida from lung tissue. In this herd, the vaccination had a beneficial effect on daily weight gain of pigs (695.9 g/day compared to 683.1 g/day for the control groups). The improvement of the age at slaughtering was 1.3 days for treated groups and 2.4 days for vaccinated groups compared to control groups. The vaccination induced a significant improvement in muscle rate (57.05%) compared to control groups (56.41%, p < 0.05) and to treated groups (56.21%, p < 0.001). In this herd infected with M hyopneumoniae, after allowing for treatment cost, manpower excepted, the increase in value was from -3 FF to -11 FF for the antibiotic treatment and +10.4 FF for the vaccination. From economical and medical points of view, the vaccination was preferable to the treatment under the conditions described in this study.

Key concepts: Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Vaccination, Herd, Pasteurella multocida, Pneumonia, Biology, Medicine, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparison of the use of a vaccine and sequential antibiotic treatment in a herd infected with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens