[Preoperative diagnosis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Is there an indication for routine intravenous cholangiography?].
S. Truong, Maud H.E. Jansen, Sean Willis, J. Neuerburg, Christoph Schraven, V. Schumpèlick
Abstract
S. Truong, Maud H.E. Jansen, Sean Willis, J. Neuerburg, Christoph Schraven, V. Schumpèlick
Abstract
In a retrospective study including 163 patients we investigated the necessity of i.v. cholangiography in preoperative routine diagnostic workup prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We evaluated the evidence of i.v. cholangiography concerning the anatomy of the biliary system, the evidence of common bile duct or cystic duct stones and the influence on the further therapeutic procedure. While the common bile duct could be demonstrated in 96.3%, the cystic duct could be visualized in only 54.6%. One out of two patients with a short cystic duct was identified. Stones in the gallbladder were recognized in 72.4% of cases, while only two out of three patients with common bile duct stones were diagnosed. In nine cases a deep junction of the cystic duct was found, but there was no influence on further operative procedure. Thus we found no improvement after routine use of i.v. cholangiography concerning the evidence of common bile duct stones or avoidance of intraoperative lesions of the common bile duct. The routine use of i.v. cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy is therefore not justified.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In a retrospective study including 163 patients we investigated the necessity of i.v. cholangiography in preoperative routine diagnostic workup prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We evaluated the evidence of i.v. cholangiography concerning the anatomy of the biliary system, the evidence of common bile duct or cystic duct stones and the influence on the further therapeutic procedure. While the common bile duct could be demonstrated in 96.3%, the cystic duct could be visualized in only 54.6%. One out of two patients with a short cystic duct was identified. Stones in the gallbladder were recognized in 72.4% of cases, while only two out of three patients with common bile duct stones were diagnosed. In nine cases a deep junction of the cystic duct was found, but there was no influence on further operative procedure. Thus we found no improvement after routine use of i.v. cholangiography concerning the evidence of common bile duct stones or avoidance of intraoperative lesions of the common bile duct. The routine use of i.v. cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy is therefore not justified.
Key concepts: Cholangiography, Medicine, Cystic duct, Cholecystectomy, Common bile duct, Gallbladder, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Common Duct