1985PubMedRequires access

Evoked serial electromyography in the evaluation of the paralyzed face.

Herbert Silverstein, McDaniel Ab, Hyman Sm

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

Serial evoked electromyography (EEMG) is a reliable, objective, repeatable test of facial nerve function. It is very important in the initial patient evaluation in determining percent degeneration of the facial nerve. A response of 0-20% will usually result in incomplete return of facial function while responses of 60% or better will usually result in normal function. With viral facial paralysis (Bell's palsy, herpes zoster oticus), serial EEMG after several weeks has little value in predicting the final percent recovery of facial function. If there is no EEMG response, the diagnosis of viral facial paralysis is questionable and serial tests should be done until facial function begins to return. If there is no return of facial function or EEMG responses, the diagnosis is probably a tumor and the nerve should be explored. When surgical manipulation of the facial nerve has resulted in partial facial weakness, EEMG helps predict the degree of recovery of facial function. EEMG results of 60% or better will result in normal facial function while EEMG results of 25% or less will result in incomplete return of facial function. Serial testing is not necessary in this group of patients. After transection and repair of the facial nerve, serial EEMG is of value in showing continuity of the repair. Lack of improvement in EEMG over 5-12 months and no return of facial function indicates poor prognosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Serial evoked electromyography (EEMG) is a reliable, objective, repeatable test of facial nerve function. It is very important in the initial patient evaluation in determining percent degeneration of the facial nerve. A response of 0-20% will usually result in incomplete return of facial function while responses of 60% or better will usually result in normal function. With viral facial paralysis (Bell's palsy, herpes zoster oticus), serial EEMG after several weeks has little value in predicting the final percent recovery of facial function. If there is no EEMG response, the diagnosis of viral facial paralysis is questionable and serial tests should be done until facial function begins to return. If there is no return of facial function or EEMG responses, the diagnosis is probably a tumor and the nerve should be explored. When surgical manipulation of the facial nerve has resulted in partial facial weakness, EEMG helps predict the degree of recovery of facial function. EEMG results of 60% or better will result in normal facial function while EEMG results of 25% or less will result in incomplete return of facial function. Serial testing is not necessary in this group of patients. After transection and repair of the facial nerve, serial EEMG is of value in showing continuity of the repair. Lack of improvement in EEMG over 5-12 months and no return of facial function indicates poor prognosis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Serial evoked electromyography (EEMG) is a reliable, objective, repeatable test of facial nerve function. It is very important in the initial patient evaluation in determining percent degeneration of the facial nerve. A response of 0-20% will usually result in incomplete return of facial function while responses of 60% or better will usually result in normal function. With viral facial paralysis (Bell's palsy, herpes zoster oticus), serial EEMG after several weeks has little value in predicting the final percent recovery of facial function. If there is no EEMG response, the diagnosis of viral facial paralysis is questionable and serial tests should be done until facial function begins to return. If there is no return of facial function or EEMG responses, the diagnosis is probably a tumor and the nerve should be explored. When surgical manipulation of the facial nerve has resulted in partial facial weakness, EEMG helps predict the degree of recovery of facial function. EEMG results of 60% or better will result in normal facial function while EEMG results of 25% or less will result in incomplete return of facial function. Serial testing is not necessary in this group of patients. After transection and repair of the facial nerve, serial EEMG is of value in showing continuity of the repair. Lack of improvement in EEMG over 5-12 months and no return of facial function indicates poor prognosis.

Key concepts: Facial nerve, Medicine, Facial paralysis, Electromyography, Palsy, Facial muscles, Facial weakness, Facial electromyography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evoked serial electromyography in the evaluation of the paralyzed face. — Research Paper | ScholarLens