2009PubMedRequires access

[Diagnosis that should be remembered during evaluation of trauma patients: diaphragmatic rupture].

Maruf Şanlı, Ahmet Feridun Işık, Bülent Tunçözgür, Fatih Meteroğlu, Levent Elbeylı

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to emphasize the importance of delay in diagnosis of traumatic diaphragmatic ruptures and to investigate the results of treatment methods. METHODS: The records of 13 patients (11 males, 2 females; mean age 34.6; range 7 to 52 years) with traumatic diaphragmatic ruptures were evaluated with respect to demographic data, type and time of trauma, symptoms, diagnostic methods, localization, surgical therapy, morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Blunt trauma was present in 8 cases (61.6%) and penetrating trauma in 5. Migration of abdominal organs into hemithorax was detected in 11 cases radiologically. The duration between diagnosis and the event was 2-20 years in 6 patients (46.1%). Three of them were penetrating and 3 were blunt trauma. In 3 cases, diagnosis had been overlooked despite exploratory thoracotomy and laparotomy in another center. Right hemi-diaphragm was injured in 1 patient and the left in 12 cases. Primary repair through posterolateral thoracotomy was performed in all cases. Morbidity occurred in 1 patient. No mortality was observed. CONCLUSION: Diaphragmatic ruptures should be remembered in trauma cases because of the probability of their being missed, and ruptures should be explored during thoracotomy or laparotomy performed for other organ injuries. Delayed diagnosis will increase morbidity and mortality.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: We aimed to emphasize the importance of delay in diagnosis of traumatic diaphragmatic ruptures and to investigate the results of treatment methods. METHODS: The records of 13 patients (11 males, 2 females; mean age 34.6; range 7 to 52 years) with traumatic diaphragmatic ruptures were evaluated with respect to demographic data, type and time of trauma, symptoms, diagnostic methods, localization, surgical therapy, morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Blunt trauma was present in 8 cases (61.6%) and penetrating trauma in 5. Migration of abdominal organs into hemithorax was detected in 11 cases radiologically. The duration between diagnosis and the event was 2-20 years in 6 patients (46.1%). Three of them were penetrating and 3 were blunt trauma. In 3 cases, diagnosis had been overlooked despite exploratory thoracotomy and laparotomy in another center. Right hemi-diaphragm was injured in 1 patient and the left in 12 cases. Primary repair through posterolateral thoracotomy was performed in all cases. Morbidity occurred in 1 patient. No mortality was observed. CONCLUSION: Diaphragmatic ruptures should be remembered in trauma cases because of the probability of their being missed, and ruptures should be explored during thoracotomy or laparotomy performed for other organ injuries. Delayed diagnosis will increase morbidity and mortality.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to emphasize the importance of delay in diagnosis of traumatic diaphragmatic ruptures and to investigate the results of treatment methods. METHODS: The records of 13 patients (11 males, 2 females; mean age 34.6; range 7 to 52 years) with traumatic diaphragmatic ruptures were evaluated with respect to demographic data, type and time of trauma, symptoms, diagnostic methods, localization, surgical therapy, morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Blunt trauma was present in 8 cases (61.6%) and penetrating trauma in 5. Migration of abdominal organs into hemithorax was detected in 11 cases radiologically. The duration between diagnosis and the event was 2-20 years in 6 patients (46.1%). Three of them were penetrating and 3 were blunt trauma. In 3 cases, diagnosis had been overlooked despite exploratory thoracotomy and laparotomy in another center. Right hemi-diaphragm was injured in 1 patient and the left in 12 cases. Primary repair through posterolateral thoracotomy was performed in all cases. Morbidity occurred in 1 patient. No mortality was observed. CONCLUSION: Diaphragmatic ruptures should be remembered in trauma cases because of the probability of their being missed, and ruptures should be explored during thoracotomy or laparotomy performed for other organ injuries. Delayed diagnosis will increase morbidity and mortality.

Key concepts: Medicine, Thoracotomy, Exploratory laparotomy, Diaphragmatic breathing, Surgery, Penetrating trauma, Laparotomy, Blunt

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Diagnosis that should be remembered during evaluation of trauma patients: diaphragmatic rupture]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens