1989•PubMedRequires access

Renal excretion of iopromide and iopamidol after intravenous administration in digital subtraction angiography.

Wolfgang Mutzel, M Langer, R Keysser

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

After injection of iopromide or iopamidol into a central vein in 40 patients ages 57 +/- 14 years and 57 +/- 11 years, respectively, with normal renal function, iodine concentration and total iodine excretion were determined in pooled urine over 0 to 2 hours and 2 to 24 hours after injection. Iopromide excretion of 46.4 +/- 9.8% of the dose during the first 2 hours after injection was significantly (p less than 0.05) higher than that of iopamidol, which amounted to 41.4 +/- 10.5% of the dose. This is presumably due to the fact that iopromide has lower protein binding than iopamidol. Excretion of the two nonionic contrast media up to 2 hours after injection decreased constantly with increasing age. In the case of iopromide, a mean excretion of 55% of the dose in a patient 25 years old decreased to about 40% for a patient 90 years of age (p less than 0.05). The clinical relevance of the observed differences and correlations is discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

After injection of iopromide or iopamidol into a central vein in 40 patients ages 57 +/- 14 years and 57 +/- 11 years, respectively, with normal renal function, iodine concentration and total iodine excretion were determined in pooled urine over 0 to 2 hours and 2 to 24 hours after injection. Iopromide excretion of 46.4 +/- 9.8% of the dose during the first 2 hours after injection was significantly (p less than 0.05) higher than that of iopamidol, which amounted to 41.4 +/- 10.5% of the dose. This is presumably due to the fact that iopromide has lower protein binding than iopamidol. Excretion of the two nonionic contrast media up to 2 hours after injection decreased constantly with increasing age. In the case of iopromide, a mean excretion of 55% of the dose in a patient 25 years old decreased to about 40% for a patient 90 years of age (p less than 0.05). The clinical relevance of the observed differences and correlations is discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

After injection of iopromide or iopamidol into a central vein in 40 patients ages 57 +/- 14 years and 57 +/- 11 years, respectively, with normal renal function, iodine concentration and total iodine excretion were determined in pooled urine over 0 to 2 hours and 2 to 24 hours after injection. Iopromide excretion of 46.4 +/- 9.8% of the dose during the first 2 hours after injection was significantly (p less than 0.05) higher than that of iopamidol, which amounted to 41.4 +/- 10.5% of the dose. This is presumably due to the fact that iopromide has lower protein binding than iopamidol. Excretion of the two nonionic contrast media up to 2 hours after injection decreased constantly with increasing age. In the case of iopromide, a mean excretion of 55% of the dose in a patient 25 years old decreased to about 40% for a patient 90 years of age (p less than 0.05). The clinical relevance of the observed differences and correlations is discussed.

Key concepts: Iopromide, Iopamidol, Excretion, Medicine, Iodine, Urine, Urology, Digital subtraction angiography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Renal excretion of iopromide and iopamidol after intravenous administration in digital subtraction angiography. — Research Paper | ScholarLens