1989PubMedRequires access

[Indications for renal biopsy].

H Favre

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The cost/benefit ratio of renal biopsy defines the mandatory indications in situations where histologic diagnosis is required for the choice of treatment and for predicting the evolution of renal function. These indications include nephrotic syndrome, permanent proteinuria associated with microhematuria or not, rapidly progressive nephropathies, and, at least in some authors' view, systemic lupus erythematosus. Additional indications should be considered in patients presenting with acute renal failure of unknown origin, renal involvement accompanying systemic diseases, isolated microhematuria and intermittent proteinuria. In these latter indications histology allows the choice of specific therapy in some 20% of cases; the evolution of renal function can be correctly evaluated in 90% of cases. Patients usually consider renal biopsy a benign investigation which helps them to cope with their disease on the basis of a definite diagnosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The cost/benefit ratio of renal biopsy defines the mandatory indications in situations where histologic diagnosis is required for the choice of treatment and for predicting the evolution of renal function. These indications include nephrotic syndrome, permanent proteinuria associated with microhematuria or not, rapidly progressive nephropathies, and, at least in some authors' view, systemic lupus erythematosus. Additional indications should be considered in patients presenting with acute renal failure of unknown origin, renal involvement accompanying systemic diseases, isolated microhematuria and intermittent proteinuria. In these latter indications histology allows the choice of specific therapy in some 20% of cases; the evolution of renal function can be correctly evaluated in 90% of cases. Patients usually consider renal biopsy a benign investigation which helps them to cope with their disease on the basis of a definite diagnosis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The cost/benefit ratio of renal biopsy defines the mandatory indications in situations where histologic diagnosis is required for the choice of treatment and for predicting the evolution of renal function. These indications include nephrotic syndrome, permanent proteinuria associated with microhematuria or not, rapidly progressive nephropathies, and, at least in some authors' view, systemic lupus erythematosus. Additional indications should be considered in patients presenting with acute renal failure of unknown origin, renal involvement accompanying systemic diseases, isolated microhematuria and intermittent proteinuria. In these latter indications histology allows the choice of specific therapy in some 20% of cases; the evolution of renal function can be correctly evaluated in 90% of cases. Patients usually consider renal biopsy a benign investigation which helps them to cope with their disease on the basis of a definite diagnosis.

Key concepts: Microhematuria, Medicine, Renal biopsy, Nephrotic syndrome, Renal function, Proteinuria, Biopsy, Renal pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Indications for renal biopsy]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens