1979PubMedRequires access

Immune response of various animals to Akabane disease live virus vaccine.

H. Kurogi, Yuji Inaba, Hiroomi Akashi, Eiji Takahashi, Koya Sato, K Satoda, Chihiro Sugimoto, H Hatekeyama, Takeshi Omori

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

When various animals and routes of inoculation were examined for antibody response to Akabane disease live virus vaccine, the intracerebral (ic) inoculation of mice induced a better antibody response than the subcutaneous (sc) inoculation of calves, guinea pigs, hamsters, mice, or rats. Immunogenicity was compared among lots of this vaccine by performing ic inoculation of mice and sc inoculation of calves and guinea pigs. As a result, there was no distinct significant difference between any two lots of the vaccine, regardless of the animal species used. There was a tendency that the larger the dose of inoculation of the virus, the earlier the production of neutralizing (NT) antibody took place in calves inoculated with the vaccine, and the higher the antibody titer and the rate of taking a turn for positivity for antibody became in these calves. When calves immunized with the vaccine and cows in the field possessing NT antibody were given booster inoculation with the vaccine, the antibody titer showed a significant increase in almost all the calves and cows that exhibited an NT antibody titer of 4 or less at the time of booster inoculation. There were, however, no changes in antibody titer in such calves and cows as presenting an NT antibody titer of 8 or more. Calves and pregnant cows immunized with the vaccine were prevented from viremia and fetal infection when challenged by inoculation with virulent virus.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

When various animals and routes of inoculation were examined for antibody response to Akabane disease live virus vaccine, the intracerebral (ic) inoculation of mice induced a better antibody response than the subcutaneous (sc) inoculation of calves, guinea pigs, hamsters, mice, or rats. Immunogenicity was compared among lots of this vaccine by performing ic inoculation of mice and sc inoculation of calves and guinea pigs. As a result, there was no distinct significant difference between any two lots of the vaccine, regardless of the animal species used. There was a tendency that the larger the dose of inoculation of the virus, the earlier the production of neutralizing (NT) antibody took place in calves inoculated with the vaccine, and the higher the antibody titer and the rate of taking a turn for positivity for antibody became in these calves. When calves immunized with the vaccine and cows in the field possessing NT antibody were given booster inoculation with the vaccine, the antibody titer showed a significant increase in almost all the calves and cows that exhibited an NT antibody titer of 4 or less at the time of booster inoculation. There were, however, no changes in antibody titer in such calves and cows as presenting an NT antibody titer of 8 or more. Calves and pregnant cows immunized with the vaccine were prevented from viremia and fetal infection when challenged by inoculation with virulent virus.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

When various animals and routes of inoculation were examined for antibody response to Akabane disease live virus vaccine, the intracerebral (ic) inoculation of mice induced a better antibody response than the subcutaneous (sc) inoculation of calves, guinea pigs, hamsters, mice, or rats. Immunogenicity was compared among lots of this vaccine by performing ic inoculation of mice and sc inoculation of calves and guinea pigs. As a result, there was no distinct significant difference between any two lots of the vaccine, regardless of the animal species used. There was a tendency that the larger the dose of inoculation of the virus, the earlier the production of neutralizing (NT) antibody took place in calves inoculated with the vaccine, and the higher the antibody titer and the rate of taking a turn for positivity for antibody became in these calves. When calves immunized with the vaccine and cows in the field possessing NT antibody were given booster inoculation with the vaccine, the antibody titer showed a significant increase in almost all the calves and cows that exhibited an NT antibody titer of 4 or less at the time of booster inoculation. There were, however, no changes in antibody titer in such calves and cows as presenting an NT antibody titer of 8 or more. Calves and pregnant cows immunized with the vaccine were prevented from viremia and fetal infection when challenged by inoculation with virulent virus.

Key concepts: Inoculation, Virology, Antibody, Titer, Neutralizing antibody, Immunogenicity, Antibody titer, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Immune response of various animals to Akabane disease live virus vaccine. — Research Paper | ScholarLens