Quality assurance in radiation oncology in the United States.
James A. Purdy, Carlos A. Perez
Abstract
James A. Purdy, Carlos A. Perez
Abstract
We review the various components of quality assurance (QA), including the role of a QA committee, stressing its interdisciplinary nature relative to radiation oncologists, medical physicists, dosimetrists, and radiation therapy technologists. Current standard of QA are reviewed for treatment machines, dosimetry instrumentation, treatment planning, treatment planning computer systems, brachytherapy, and external beam therapy. The latter area includes discussions on the importance of a peer review new patient planning conference, chart checking and film review.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We review the various components of quality assurance (QA), including the role of a QA committee, stressing its interdisciplinary nature relative to radiation oncologists, medical physicists, dosimetrists, and radiation therapy technologists. Current standard of QA are reviewed for treatment machines, dosimetry instrumentation, treatment planning, treatment planning computer systems, brachytherapy, and external beam therapy. The latter area includes discussions on the importance of a peer review new patient planning conference, chart checking and film review.
Key concepts: Quality assurance, Medicine, Medical physics, Radiation oncology, Radiation treatment planning, Brachytherapy, Medical physicist, External beam radiation