A comparative study of the Papanicolaou staining method and the fat stain technique in malignant and non-malignant lesions of the urinary tract.
K. A. KYRKOS, S. Zachariadou‐Veneti, S Candreviotou
Abstract
K. A. KYRKOS, S. Zachariadou‐Veneti, S Candreviotou
Abstract
We have collected urine specimens from cases of malignant and nonmalignant lesions of the urinary system and have proceeded to a comparative study of these cases with their clinicopathologic findings after staining them with the Papanicolaou method and the fat stain method. It was found that the fat stain is not specific for renal cell carcinoma only. However, a combination of fat stain and Papanicolaou stain as a second check up of potential malignancy would be the best way of examination.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We have collected urine specimens from cases of malignant and nonmalignant lesions of the urinary system and have proceeded to a comparative study of these cases with their clinicopathologic findings after staining them with the Papanicolaou method and the fat stain method. It was found that the fat stain is not specific for renal cell carcinoma only. However, a combination of fat stain and Papanicolaou stain as a second check up of potential malignancy would be the best way of examination.
Key concepts: Papanicolaou stain, Medicine, Stain, Pathology, Staining, Malignancy, Urinary system, Papanicolaou Test