1990PubMedRequires access

[Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma].

Mark Erasmus, R. P. H. Veth, J D Visser, W. M. Molenaar, P. H. Robinson, H K Nielsen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A follow-up study, based on clinical, radiological and pathological information was performed of 20 patients who had suffered from an osteoid osteoma and of three patients who had been treated for an osteoblastoma in the period 1978-1988. 50% of the patients mentioned both pain at night and a good reaction to salicylates. In 87% of the cases a correct diagnosis was made with the aid of conventional radiography, tomography and bone scanning. Primary treatment consisted of intracapsular (mostly piecemeal) excision in all cases. A local recurrence was observed in one patient with osteoid osteoma and in two with osteoblastoma. At the time of this follow-up study none of the 23 patients had complaints. Histopathological examination did not reveal any difference between the two types of bone tumour.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A follow-up study, based on clinical, radiological and pathological information was performed of 20 patients who had suffered from an osteoid osteoma and of three patients who had been treated for an osteoblastoma in the period 1978-1988. 50% of the patients mentioned both pain at night and a good reaction to salicylates. In 87% of the cases a correct diagnosis was made with the aid of conventional radiography, tomography and bone scanning. Primary treatment consisted of intracapsular (mostly piecemeal) excision in all cases. A local recurrence was observed in one patient with osteoid osteoma and in two with osteoblastoma. At the time of this follow-up study none of the 23 patients had complaints. Histopathological examination did not reveal any difference between the two types of bone tumour.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A follow-up study, based on clinical, radiological and pathological information was performed of 20 patients who had suffered from an osteoid osteoma and of three patients who had been treated for an osteoblastoma in the period 1978-1988. 50% of the patients mentioned both pain at night and a good reaction to salicylates. In 87% of the cases a correct diagnosis was made with the aid of conventional radiography, tomography and bone scanning. Primary treatment consisted of intracapsular (mostly piecemeal) excision in all cases. A local recurrence was observed in one patient with osteoid osteoma and in two with osteoblastoma. At the time of this follow-up study none of the 23 patients had complaints. Histopathological examination did not reveal any difference between the two types of bone tumour.

Key concepts: Osteoid osteoma, Osteoblastoma, Medicine, Osteoma, Radiological weapon, Radiography, Radiology, Osteoid

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens