1997PubMedRequires access

Non-specific nasal provocation in children with chronic allergic rhinitis.

R. Giannico, Caros A A Oliveira, Dirceu Solé, Charles Kirov Naspitz

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Twenty-three children with chronic allergic rhinitis (Group A) and eleven normal non-atopic subjects (group C) were submitted to non-specific nasal provocation tests with histamine (0.03; 0.06; 0.125; 0.25; 0.5; 1.0; 2.0 and 4.0 mg/ml), and one week later with methacholine (0.025; 0.1; 0.25, 0.5; 1.0; 2.5; 5.0 and 10.0 mg/ml). Measurements of total nasal resistance were performed by active anterior rhinomanometry (Berger, S.A.) and symptoms were recorded. Challenges were carried out in the morning with all children in an acclimatized room (25 degrees C/77 degrees F). Concentrations of the tested drugs were increasingly instilled, and after 5 min were followed by total nasal resistance, FEV, and FVC measurements. Considering as positive those tests in which total nasal resistance had a 100% increase, we observed that both histamine and methacholine caused an increase in total nasal resistance as instilled drug concentration rose; histamine provocations were significantly more positive among group A than group C patients (91% sensitivity, 80.8% positive predictive value). This was not observed with methacholine (55% sensitivity, 75% positive predictive value). In neither provocation was there correlation between the concentration that induced a positive response and symptoms. There were no changes in spirometric values during the tests. Nasal provocations with histamine and methacholine are safe and well tolerated. Histamine seems to be more adequate for differentiating children with allergic rhinitis from normal controls.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Twenty-three children with chronic allergic rhinitis (Group A) and eleven normal non-atopic subjects (group C) were submitted to non-specific nasal provocation tests with histamine (0.03; 0.06; 0.125; 0.25; 0.5; 1.0; 2.0 and 4.0 mg/ml), and one week later with methacholine (0.025; 0.1; 0.25, 0.5; 1.0; 2.5; 5.0 and 10.0 mg/ml). Measurements of total nasal resistance were performed by active anterior rhinomanometry (Berger, S.A.) and symptoms were recorded. Challenges were carried out in the morning with all children in an acclimatized room (25 degrees C/77 degrees F). Concentrations of the tested drugs were increasingly instilled, and after 5 min were followed by total nasal resistance, FEV, and FVC measurements. Considering as positive those tests in which total nasal resistance had a 100% increase, we observed that both histamine and methacholine caused an increase in total nasal resistance as instilled drug concentration rose; histamine provocations were significantly more positive among group A than group C patients (91% sensitivity, 80.8% positive predictive value). This was not observed with methacholine (55% sensitivity, 75% positive predictive value). In neither provocation was there correlation between the concentration that induced a positive response and symptoms. There were no changes in spirometric values during the tests. Nasal provocations with histamine and methacholine are safe and well tolerated. Histamine seems to be more adequate for differentiating children with allergic rhinitis from normal controls.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Twenty-three children with chronic allergic rhinitis (Group A) and eleven normal non-atopic subjects (group C) were submitted to non-specific nasal provocation tests with histamine (0.03; 0.06; 0.125; 0.25; 0.5; 1.0; 2.0 and 4.0 mg/ml), and one week later with methacholine (0.025; 0.1; 0.25, 0.5; 1.0; 2.5; 5.0 and 10.0 mg/ml). Measurements of total nasal resistance were performed by active anterior rhinomanometry (Berger, S.A.) and symptoms were recorded. Challenges were carried out in the morning with all children in an acclimatized room (25 degrees C/77 degrees F). Concentrations of the tested drugs were increasingly instilled, and after 5 min were followed by total nasal resistance, FEV, and FVC measurements. Considering as positive those tests in which total nasal resistance had a 100% increase, we observed that both histamine and methacholine caused an increase in total nasal resistance as instilled drug concentration rose; histamine provocations were significantly more positive among group A than group C patients (91% sensitivity, 80.8% positive predictive value). This was not observed with methacholine (55% sensitivity, 75% positive predictive value). In neither provocation was there correlation between the concentration that induced a positive response and symptoms. There were no changes in spirometric values during the tests. Nasal provocations with histamine and methacholine are safe and well tolerated. Histamine seems to be more adequate for differentiating children with allergic rhinitis from normal controls.

Key concepts: Provocation test, Medicine, Rhinomanometry, Methacholine, Histamine, Nasal provocation test, Allergy, Allergen

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Non-specific nasal provocation in children with chronic allergic rhinitis. — Research Paper | ScholarLens